> **Implementation note:** Only `SessionPersistence.has()` and `.delete()` were removed. `BashExecutor.get()` and `.list()` remain because removing their one-line lookup surface required substantially more completion-tracking machinery in consumers. Their id branding is covered by the [branded-ids RFC](../architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.md).
A capability seam ([interface / implementation / consumer](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)) carries abstract methods that no consumer calls. The seam exists to let implementations and consumers evolve independently — but a method no consumer programs against is not a seam, it is speculative surface every implementation must still implement and test.
The abstract service declared its operations beyond create/append: `load`, `list`, `has`, `delete`. Production consumers of `ctx.sessionPersistence` use only two: the agent-loop resume path calls `load()` ([packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts:176](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts)), and the ACP bridge calls `list()` for `session/list` ([packages/ui/acp/src/index.ts:494](../../../../packages/ui/acp/src/index.ts)). Grepping every `sessionPersistence.*` / `persistence.*` use across `packages/*/src` and `examples/` finds no `has(` and no `delete(` on the service. The `.has(`/`.delete(` calls in `packages/ui/acp/src/index.ts` are on the in-memory `SessionStore` and a local `Set` of loading ids, not persistence. The only callers of `has`/`delete` were the contract suites and per-backend specs.
`has()` was not just unused — it was the most intricate branch in the shared coordinator: a tracked-vs-untracked dual-probe (`loadLive(id, cwd)` for a live-tracked session vs `loadStored(id)` for an untracked one) with a multi-line rationale. `delete()` dragged the `deleteStored` backend hook that every backend had to implement. This is the [drop-mutable-session-summary](../../implemented/simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md) pattern: a contract test exercised both, but no shipping code asks "is this session persisted?" or removes one.
The methods nothing consumes are removed — from the abstract seam, the implementation, and the contract/spec suites that existed only to exercise them:
-`SessionPersistence.has()` / `.delete()` are gone: the abstract declarations, the coordinator's `has`/`delete`/`deleteCore`, and the `PersistenceBackend.deleteStored` hook (jsonl + sqlite each implemented `deleteStored` only to satisfy the hook — those implementations went too). The backends are the [dual-backend](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md) design and otherwise out of scope; removing a hook they implemented for no consumer is part of removing the hook, not a backend redesign.
- Every doc and source-comment reference is updated to the surviving four-method, `list()`-only contract — not only literal `has(`/`delete(`/`deleteStored` spellings but `{@link has}`/`{@link delete}` JSDoc links and "six public methods" counts — across the seam and backend READMEs, [docs/architecture.md](../../../architecture.md), the [session-persistence](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md) and [write-coordinator](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md) RFCs, and the coordinator/backends JSDoc.
The instinct that a persistence seam "should" offer delete is real — and it is exactly the speculative-completeness the pre-release stance warns against ([AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md): optimize for the correct foundation, not for hypothetical callers you do not have). `delete()` is one method to re-add the day a consumer needs it: a session-management UI that deletes old sessions will want it — add it then, designed against that UI's real needs (soft-delete? cascade? confirmation?), not guessed now.
Re-adding a seam method with a live consumer is cheap and better-designed than the speculative version, because the consumer pins the contract. Carrying it unused means every implementation (and every future backend) must implement and test a method that does nothing.
`has`/`delete`/`deleteStored` are gone from the persistence seam, impl, and contract suites with no new dead exports; the remaining operations (`create`/`append`/`load`/`list`) are untouched, with ACP `session/list` and crash-recovery behaving identically; and the seam README and `docs/architecture.md` list only the surviving methods.
- **`delete()` is the kind of operation a product eventually wants.** True — but "eventually" is the point. Deleting it now and re-adding it against a real consumer is strictly better than shipping a guessed contract. The dual backends each shed a `deleteStored` impl, which is a bounded edit in otherwise-out-of-scope packages.
- **Low coupling.** The removal is confined to the persistence seam + impl + tests; no cross-package consumer references the removed methods, so there is no ripple beyond the docs.
