fix(gui): keep the parallel-active count outside the ellipsized hint

Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.

planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.

The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.

packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Generic tool rows classify the built-in bash, read, search, write, edit, and run
 
 Tool rows are slots too — the standalone tool ring (`ToolViewRegistry`/`ctx.toolviews`/outlet) is retired. The chat entry declares the keyed `'conversation.chat.toolview'` hole (session scope; the key space is runtime-open); its render site dispatches per row via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site `fallback`. The owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`) and `ToolRowProps` pre-composes it with the session standard kit. A registrant is a plain plugin: `ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row)` with `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` as the load-order seam (apply mounts ConversationService after the chat registration, so the service being present guarantees the slot is declared); session differentiation happens inside the component (`useSessions` reading `parentId` — the bash sample is the third-party-posture exemplar). Trajectory/waterfall toolview slots share this shape and land with their own render sites (RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders).
 
-The todo surfaces are two registrations over that shape, both plain registrant plugins with `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`. `TodoRow` takes the `'conversation.chat.toolview'` key `todo_write` and summarizes what the call attempted (`<done>/<total> 已完成 · <active hint>` parsed from its args, falling back to the generic summary on malformed or wrongly-shaped model JSON, and keeping the generic dot for non-ok execution states so a cancelled call never reads as a completed update). `TodoDock` takes the `'conversation.input.dock'` list slot at `order: -1` — above the queue rows — and is the durable plan strip: it selects `todos` off the session snapshot and renders `TodoPanel`, which takes the plain list, hides itself while the list is empty, and collapses to a one-line header carrying the same active hint. Several items may be `in_progress` at once (the tool permits parallel work), so both one-line surfaces derive that hint through `contract/todo-plan-model.ts` `planSummary`: the first active item's content plus `+<n>` for the remaining active ones, and no hint at all when nothing is active or the first active content is unusable. The expanded list needs no such rule — it renders every item with its own status glyph. The dock adapter owns the selection so the panel stays a pure function of its props; the persistent list lives here rather than in the row so the row stays one line. Anything the input-zone composer chain hides (a `conversation.composer` takeover such as ui-question's) hides the whole dock, this strip included.
+The todo surfaces are two registrations over that shape, both plain registrant plugins with `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`. `TodoRow` takes the `'conversation.chat.toolview'` key `todo_write` and summarizes what the call attempted (`<done>/<total> 已完成 · <active task>` plus a `+<n>` parallel-active count in its own span, parsed from its args, falling back to the generic summary on malformed or wrongly-shaped model JSON, and keeping the generic dot for non-ok execution states so a cancelled call never reads as a completed update). `TodoDock` takes the `'conversation.input.dock'` list slot at `order: -1` — above the queue rows — and is the durable plan strip: it selects `todos` off the session snapshot and renders `TodoPanel`, which takes the plain list, hides itself while the list is empty, and collapses to a one-line header carrying the same active hint. Several items may be `in_progress` at once (the tool permits parallel work), so both one-line surfaces derive that hint through `contract/todo-plan-model.ts` `planSummary`: the first active item's content plus a separate count of the remaining active ones, and no hint at all when nothing is active or the first active content is unusable. `planSummary` deliberately does not join the two — both surfaces ellipsize the task name, so a count concatenated onto its end would be the first thing a narrow viewport clips; each renders the count in its own non-shrinking span. The expanded list needs no such rule — it renders every item with its own status glyph. The dock adapter owns the selection so the panel stays a pure function of its props; the persistent list lives here rather than in the row so the row stays one line. Anything the input-zone composer chain hides (a `conversation.composer` takeover such as ui-question's) hides the whole dock, this strip included.
 
 Per-session UI state (selection, ordinary composer draft, active view) lives in the declared chat store (`stores.ts` `createChatStore`): apply constructs one handle and passes it to the conversation, chat-view, and details registrations, so the session slots share one instance per session (selection written by the chat view, read by details) and the framework owns instance lifecycle and draft persistence. The frontend Session Intent comes from the Session list projection; after publication, any retained prompt comes from that Session's conversation snapshot. Components are pure — the framework standard kit (`useSession`/`sessionId` when session-scoped, plus global `useSessions`/`useWorkspaces`) and the store faces (`useStore`/`actions`) arrive automatically from the registration declaration; inject factories contribute plain data and callbacks for runtime Session actions, send/stop, tabs, details, and paging.