Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

workflow: rename dsh-workflow-vm to dsh-workflow-workerthread

Browse Source 
Pure mechanical rename now that the package's internals are the
worker-thread engine: directory, package name, spec/e2e filenames,
module tags and logger prefixes, tsconfig/knip/run-gates/AGENTS.md
references, example cordis.yml plugin ids, doc links; catalogs
regenerated and the lockfile refreshed.
This commit is contained in:
imccyu
2026-07-09 19:06:55 +08:00
parent d5c65e2b4c
commit 0d11a3afc7
43 changed files with 59 additions and 59 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferre
`ctx.workflows` is an abstract `WorkflowService` in the bash shape — one engine per context, no named-provider registry (engines are deployment swaps, not co-residents). `start(request)` throws synchronously for a script that cannot begin; a returned `WorkflowRun`'s `result` NEVER rejects (failures resolve as `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`). The `workflow/*` events are observe-only emits carrying DATA SNAPSHOTS (id + meta; `workflow/end` omits the result value), per-listener contained, mirroring `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` — control stays with the run's holder. Vocabulary details: [core-data-structures/workflow.md](../../../core-data-structures/workflow.md).
### The engine (dsh-workflow-vm): one worker thread per run
### The engine (dsh-workflow-workerthread): one worker thread per run
**Trust premise (governs every engine decision below)**: workflow scripts are MODEL-WRITTEN — the same trust level as the model's existing bash access — so the engine defends against BUGGY scripts, never hostile ones. In scope: `result` never rejects, no unhandled rejections from dropped hook promises, loud rejection of values JSON cannot carry, fatal-vs-null hook discipline, cancellation that always frees the caller. Out of scope, deliberately: adversarial values (throwing/spinning accessors, proxies with hostile traps, prototype forgery, `prepareStackTrace` hijack) AND Node-API escape from the script's context — the vm context shares object machinery with its surrounding realm, so a script can reach the `Function` constructor (`globalThis.constructor.constructor`) and from it `process` and every Node builtin; the absent globals are API surface, not containment, and a worker thread is NOT a security boundary (an escapee holds process-wide privileges — Node's permission model is per-process). Worker-side code MAY run script code while reading script values, and that is accepted: a synchronous spin costs the script its OWN thread (terminated at the post-cancel grace), never the host loop, so containing error VALUES would be cost without a threat model. Genuine sandboxing (isolated-vm, a separate process) remains an engine swap behind the seam, not incremental defenses here.