docs: rebalance prose cleanup and add trimming skill

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-13 23:27:00 +08:00
parent fcdc318dda
commit 148046b9c8
392 changed files with 2801 additions and 1754 deletions
@@ -75,6 +75,6 @@ Tool determinism comes from a temporary cwd, scrubbed environment, fresh non-log
## Consequences
The new tier adds reviewed per-scenario input, session, stdout, optional override, and optional workspace fixtures. In return it provides deterministic keyless transcript coverage through the real Loader and tool composition. The subprocess, input, workspace, normalization, and replay harness can support examples beyond ACP.
The new tier adds reviewed per-scenario input, session, stdout, optional override, and optional workspace fixtures. Workspace seeds are copied into the temporary cwd for both record and replay. In return the tier provides deterministic keyless transcript coverage through the real Loader and tool composition. The subprocess, input, workspace, normalization, and replay harness can support examples beyond ACP.
This RFC relates to but does not supersede the [proposed determinism RFC](../../proposed/testing/2026-06-11-deterministic-and-stress-testing.md): that proposal's "universal replay fixture" re-derives session *message history* after every test (an internal-consistency invariant), whereas snapshot tests pin the *external protocol output*. They are complementary — one guards the event-sourcing invariant, the other guards the editor-facing contract.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
The harness leans hard on real-API tests by policy: [docs/testing.md](../../../testing.md) argues that a no-key suite proves the plumbing but not the product, and the [ACP inject postmortem](../../../postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md) is the standing proof — 178 keyless tests stayed green while a real editor session crashed instantly. The real-API e2e suite (`pnpm run test:e2e`, the `*.e2e.ts` files) exists precisely to close that gap: it drives the agent against the live DeepSeek API — real model calls, real bash tools, multi-turn, resume, ACP-over-stdio.
But until this change **nothing in CI ran it**. The default gate ([.github/workflows/ci.yml](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml)) is deliberately keyless it carries no secret, runs on every push and PR including from forks, and stays green for any contributor. `test:e2e` self-skips without a key (`describe.skipIf(!process.env.DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)`), so even if ci.yml invoked it, a keyless runner would skip it green. The real-API safety net therefore only fired when a developer happened to run it locally with a key in their environment — i.e. unreliably, and never as a merge gate.
The default gate ([.github/workflows/ci.yml](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml)) is deliberately keyless: it carries no secret and runs for forks. `test:e2e` self-skips without a key (`describe.skipIf(!process.env.DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)`), so adding it there would report green without exercising the real suite. A separate secret-bearing workflow is required to make real-API coverage a merge signal.
This RFC records the decision to add a **second, secret-consuming workflow** that runs the real-API suite in CI, and — because introducing the first CI secret into a repo that may later go public is a security/isolation decision — the threat model it relies on and what changes when the repo becomes public.
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ ci.yml's value is that it is keyless, forkable, and always-green: any contributo
### Cost is not the constraint; reliability is
The usual reason to ration real-API CI — token cost — does not apply here: we are DeepSeek and internal inference is effectively free. So the design optimizes for *coverage and signal*, not for minimizing calls. The suite runs in full (all matching `*.e2e.ts` files), on multiple triggers, on every trusted PR. This is the CI embodiment of the [docs/testing.md](../../../testing.md) with-key policy.
Internal inference cost is not the limiting constraint, so the workflow optimizes for coverage and signal. It runs every matching `*.e2e.ts` file on multiple triggers and every trusted PR, implementing the [docs/testing.md](../../../testing.md) with-key policy.
### Triggers: trusted events only
`workflow_dispatch` + `push` to `main`/`master` + nightly `schedule` (`17 0 * * *`, 08:17 Asia/Shanghai) + `pull_request`. Push gives a post-merge signal; schedule catches drift in the external API itself even with no commits; dispatch is the manual escape hatch; `pull_request` gives a pre-merge gate. The user explicitly chose to include PR runs for the pre-merge signal, accepting the larger key-exposure surface that implies (see § Security).
`workflow_dispatch` + `push` to `main`/`master` + nightly `schedule` (`17 0 * * *`, 08:17 Asia/Shanghai) + `pull_request`. Push gives a post-merge signal; schedule catches external-API drift; dispatch is the manual escape hatch; and trusted pull requests get a pre-merge gate. That pre-merge signal deliberately accepts the larger key-exposure surface described under § Security.
### The untrusted-PR gate
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ The repo secret is named `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY_EXTERNAL`; it is mapped to the `DEEPS
- **Step-scoped secret.** `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` is set in the `env:` of only the preflight and e2e steps, never job-level — so checkout/setup-node/install never see it. A compromised install-time lifecycle script in a dependency cannot read a secret that isn't in its environment.
- **`permissions: contents: read`.** The job only reads the repo to run tests; it needs no write scopes (no PR comments, no status writes), so the `GITHUB_TOKEN` is dropped to least privilege.
- **`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` pinned** to `https://api.deepseek.com` on the e2e step. The adapter would default to this when unset ([packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/index.ts) `PUBLIC_BASE_URL`), but pinning is self-documenting and hermetic — a stray repo-root `.env` (which `vitest.e2e.config.ts` loads if present) cannot silently redirect the run to another endpoint.
- **No secret echoed.** The preflight prints only `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY present.` — not the value, not its length. (An earlier draft echoed `${#KEY}`; dropped as needless metadata.)
- **No secret echoed.** The preflight prints only `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY present.` — not the value or its length.
### Scope, runtime shape
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ The job runs only `test:e2e` on Node 24; keyless gates and version compatibility
## Security
Introducing the first CI secret is the part of this change that warrants a recorded threat model, because the natural question — *"can anyone who opens a PR steal the key?"* — has a non-obvious answer, and the answer shifts when the repo goes public.
The repository's first CI secret requires a recorded threat model because access differs between same-repository, fork, and Dependabot pull requests and changes when the repository becomes public.
### Who can reach the secret today (private repo)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ So "everyone who could open a PR can steal it" is false: only the write-access s
### The residual exposure the `pull_request` trigger adds
Because PR runs are enabled, the key is handed to **the code on a write-access author's PR branch** — code under review, not yet merged — which is a strictly larger surface than `push`-to-main + `schedule` + `workflow_dispatch` alone (where the key only ever touches already-merged or manually-dispatched code). This was the explicit round-1 tradeoff: the pre-merge real-API gate is worth it for a trusted internal write set and a low-value (internal, free) key. If that calculus changes, the hardening is one line — drop the `pull_request` trigger — keeping post-merge + nightly + on-demand coverage.
Because PR runs are enabled, the key is handed to **the code on a write-access author's PR branch** before merge. This is a larger surface than `push` + `schedule` + `workflow_dispatch`, accepted for a pre-merge signal within the trusted write set. If that calculus changes, drop the `pull_request` trigger while retaining post-merge, nightly, and on-demand coverage.
### What changes when the repo goes public
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Replay is keyed **per calling session**, and the harness harvests **every** sess
### 1. The calling session id rides on the model request
`GenerateOptions` gains an optional `sessionId`, stamped by the agent loop from `agent.session.id` at request-assembly time (where the session is already in scope). Adapters ignore it; it exists so an `llm/stream` listener can route a call by WHICH session issued it. It is typed `Branded<'SessionId'>` (from `dsh-brand`) rather than importing `SessionId` from `dsh-session` — that package imports `Message` from `dsh-llm`, so importing its id back would cycle. `SessionId` IS `Branded<'SessionId'>`, so a real id assigns with no cast. (A future dedicated ids package could own the brand and dissolve the note; tracked separately — it touches every id import and does not belong in this testing PR.)
`GenerateOptions` gains an optional `sessionId`, stamped by the agent loop from `agent.session.id` at request-assembly time (where the session is already in scope). Adapters ignore it; it exists so an `llm/stream` listener can route a call by WHICH session issued it. It is typed `Branded<'SessionId'>` (from `dsh-brand`) rather than importing `SessionId` from `dsh-session` — that package imports `Message` from `dsh-llm`, so importing its id back would cycle. `SessionId` IS `Branded<'SessionId'>`, so a real id assigns with no cast. A dedicated ids package could own the brand later, but that change touches every id import and is tracked separately.
### 2. Replay binds live sessions to recorded scripts by first-call order
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ That is the tier a mocked unit test structurally cannot be: it exercises the REA
## Decision
Two coupled changes, in one PR:
The implementation has two coupled parts:
### 1. The ACP example ships BOTH hook bridges
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ The machinery lives in [`packages/support/acp-snapshot`](../../../../packages/su
- **An injectable ACP `Client` factory instead of declarative `permissionAnswers`** — maximally flexible, but it leaks SDK client construction to every consumer and reopens per-example drift in exactly the layer being unified; a declarative queue keeps `input.json` the single scripting surface and stays golden-normalizable.
- **Generalize beyond ACP (a transport-agnostic snapshot harness)** — no second transport exists; the harness is ACP-shaped end to end (SDK client, JSON-RPC frames, `session/update` waiters), and a speculative abstraction would be a seam split ahead of any consumer.
## Testing
Extraction preserved every existing ACP golden byte. The package's `src/` has per-file 100% coverage through a scripted ACP subprocess: harness tests cover every step operation, both expected-error branches, permission selection/fallback/impossible choice, environment forwarding, workspace seeding, and harvest ordering/noise/fallback; suite tests execute replay against committed synthetic fixtures and record against a temporary copy, plus the pure helpers. Two structurally unreachable guards retain reasoned coverage exclusions. The fake agent substitutes the `session/new` cwd into logs, including Darwin's `/var` realpath behavior, matching the real bin.
## Consequences
A new example gets the whole snapshot tier from a scenario table plus fixtures — the sandbox branch merges master down and adds its own suite (own pin scenario, own overlay, fixtures via `test:snapshot:record`, approvals via `permissionAnswers`). The costs: `suite.ts` imports vitest, so the package is importable only inside a vitest run — a shape no other package has, stated in its README; each suite pins its own ~8 KB header fixture (a genuinely distinct composition deserves its own pin; an identical one would be caught by that suite's uniformity guard); and the e2e launcher duplication remains (`TODO(acp-test-harness)`) — the harness is the extraction target when that migration lands.