docs: purge chain-of-thought leakage from prose

Delete design-session citations (decision/audit/plan ordinals, stack positions), change narration, review choreography, and reviewer-addressed justification from comments, JSDoc, docs, READMEs, Agent Notes, tests, and generator templates; restate every affected fact as current-state contract prose. Fix generated docs at their sources and regenerate the catalogs and cordis-surface regions; re-paste type-equiv blocks; update every bilingual counterpart and re-record the pairs. Record the citation rule in the committed-artifact-citations Agent Note.
2026-08-09 15:09:19 +08:00
parent 793f6f55df
commit 25dcd7293c
763 changed files with 2705 additions and 1710 deletions
@@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ Rejected for the seam. `prompt` turns fetch into LLM summarization and couples p
 - SSRF / private-network protection for `web_fetch`: block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and otherwise non-public destinations so `web_fetch` is not an SSRF primitive. Doing it correctly is more than a URL-string check — it needs DNS-resolve-then-connect-to-the-validated-IP (to defeat DNS rebinding / TOCTOU), per-hop re-validation across redirects, and IPv6 edge handling (private ranges, IPv4-mapped addresses). Neither reference implementation surveyed does IP-level blocking (OpenCode does a prefix check then fetches; Claude Code relies on a centralized hostname blocklist plus a "private URLs will fail" prompt), so there is no implementation to copy and this is the harness's only SSRF defense — it warrants its own focused design/spike. Until it lands, `web_fetch` must only be enabled in deployments that cannot reach sensitive internal targets.
 - A `pdf` `WebFetchBody` kind: the `local-http` provider decodes text-extractable PDFs (best-effort, capped, `truncated`) into a `{ kind: 'pdf'; content; pageCount? }` arm, and `tool-web` renders it. This is fetch, not `web_extract` — PDF retrieval is a concrete HTTP 200 plus deterministic local decoding, not provider-side extraction of a non-HTTP resource. Adding it is a coordinated change across `dsh-web` (declare the arm), the provider (decode + narrow "binary rejection" to "reject binary except text-extractable PDF"; scanned/image PDFs needing OCR stay out of scope), and `tool-web` (render). The closed `WebFetchBody` union makes the consumer side fail to compile until the new arm is handled.
 - Provider-backed extraction as a separate `web_extract` capability, rather than widening `web_fetch` silently.
- Permission policy integration once the deferred permission system lands.
+- Permission policy integration: the permission system now exists ([sandbox and approval](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md), [web permission presets](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)) but bundles only sandbox mode and approval policy; web permission policy remains unintegrated.
 - Provider-neutral search controls beyond `query` and `maxResults`, once Exa and Perplexity can both honor them honestly.

 ## Open questions

 - Should product app packages probe web configuration at startup (treating `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_MISSING`, `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`, and `WEB_PROVIDER_AMBIGUOUS` as fatal when web is explicitly configured), or leave misconfiguration to surface at the first execution?
- Where should permission policy for public web access live once the deferred permission system lands: a dedicated web permission plugin on `tools/execute`, provider config, or both?
+- Where should permission policy for public web access live in the shipped permission system ([sandbox and approval](../feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md), [web permission presets](../feature/2026-07-23-web-permission-and-approval.md)): a dedicated web permission plugin on `tools/execute`, provider config, or both?