Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

docs: purge chain-of-thought leakage from prose

Browse Source 
Delete design-session citations (decision/audit/plan ordinals, stack
positions), change narration, review choreography, and reviewer-addressed
justification from comments, JSDoc, docs, READMEs, Agent Notes, tests, and
generator templates; restate every affected fact as current-state contract
prose. Fix generated docs at their sources and regenerate the catalogs and
cordis-surface regions; re-paste type-equiv blocks; update every bilingual
counterpart and re-record the pairs. Record the citation rule in the
committed-artifact-citations Agent Note.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-08-09 15:09:19 +08:00
parent 793f6f55df
commit 25dcd7293c
763 changed files with 2705 additions and 1710 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md
+3 -3
View File
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Language selection is a lookup on `ctx.codeRuntime.language`, resolved lazily at
Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which the public `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first; the test reads one of those getters off the definition directly, under a language absent from both tables. A language present in `SDK_RENDERERS` but not `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` is drift the shared `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` pins reject at `typecheck`, so it is not an input either guard can see; what the guards still own is a mounted runtime reporting a language absent from both tables. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, reached by definition readers and `schemas()`, of which the doc-catalog harvest is the only shipped one and none of which feeds a model because assembly passes `requireCodeRuntime` first) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member and the two table entries — plus its renderer and the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them (the seam's `dsh-code-runtime` README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair; this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc — no gate checks any of it), with no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
`code-mode.ts` depends only on the runtime Service Definition (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`), never on a concrete backend; dispatch is by `runtime.language` at run time. The tool layer therefore lands independently of the protocol and backend PRs — it needs only the service's `language` field, which is already on master.
`code-mode.ts` depends only on the runtime Service Definition (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`), never on a concrete backend; dispatch is by `runtime.language` at run time. The tool layer is therefore independent of the Python protocol and backend — it needs only the service's `language` field.
### The Python SDK renderer
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ The standard that cap serves is grammatical validity, and the boundary is delibe
## Consequences
Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: one PR after the drift, at the Consumer's integration point rather than where it was introduced, and on this base never, since no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as the state at their own PR and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the Service Definition package must not import its Consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the Service Definition would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it lands and is testable on master ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: at the Consumer's integration point rather than where the drift was introduced — and never while no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as they stood at the time and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the Service Definition package must not import its Consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the Service Definition would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it ships and is testable ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable on this base: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this PR's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the PR that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable in the shipped tree: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this change's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the change that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
Two runtime contracts the Python SDK text asserts are owed by that same backend PR. First, the instructions tell the model that exactly `tools` and `ToolCallError` are bound and that the declared `TypedDict` classes are not, so the backend must inject those two names — with `ToolCallError.toolName` populated per the seam's `errorClass` contract — and must NOT bind the declared class names into the program's globals; injecting them "helpfully" would make the SDK text false. Second, the language has to be bound to the request: `requireCodeRuntime` resolves `ctx.codeRuntime` separately at assembly and at `run_code` execution, so a reload that swapped the runtime between those two points would hand a program written against one flavor to the other. The split is finer than those two points — `run_code`'s `description` and `parameters` getters each call `resolveFlavor(peekRuntime())`, and `schemaOf` destructures both, so one projection reads the runtime twice; both reads are for `run_code`'s own schema, since the getters are installed on that one definition and every other definition carries plain data properties. A reload between those two reads yields a single schema whose two halves name different languages. Neither is reachable here — one published backend means both reads return the same flavor and no program ever runs against this renderer's output — and the cross-language rejection is not testable until a second language exists.