refactor(packages): dissolve ui/ and rename sdk/ to scaffold/

git mv per the regrouping RFC: the five human-collaboration seams and
tui join packages/interaction/, app-boot becomes packages/boot/, and
jsonrpc joins the renamed scaffold/ (formerly sdk/) as its server half
beside client/protocol/create-sdk/helper/scripts/telemetry, whose
folders drop the legacy sdk- prefix. Three new group README triplets
replace the ui/ and sdk/ ones; tsconfig references/paths/globs,
knip keys, vitest globs, gate scripts, catalogs, docs, and the
lockfile follow. Adds the four settled FIXME rename markers
(dsh-sdk-server, dsh-sdk-telemetry, dsh-sdk-helper, dsh-sdk-scripts).

The scaffold folders diverge from their npm names until those renames
land, so tsconfig.base.json maps the three affected names explicitly
beside the group wildcard. Also repairs two pre-existing stale-path
classes the strengthened sweep surfaced: docs/web-styling.md's retired
web-ui host package and type-model spec fixture-literal joins.

app-boot's three Loader-composition specs time out at the default 5s
under full-suite parallel load on this filesystem (pre-existing;
pass isolated with --testTimeout=30000); interaction/scaffold/boot
suites otherwise green (687 passed).
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-30 03:13:49 +08:00
parent 7e445c3a67
commit 3fc35c91ff
351 changed files with 368 additions and 311 deletions
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The routing problem is ownership: a permission request must reach the channel th
## Decision
One package, `dsh-user-approval` (`packages/ui/user-approval`), owns the vocabulary and the `ctx.approval` service — the mechanism. The policy — who answers, and whether a session is asked at all — lives outside it: answerers are `approval/request` waterfall listeners registered by channel-owning plugins (the ACP bridge, host adapters, and test scripts), and a per-session policy tier can decide before a channel is involved. Consumers (`dsh-tools`' ask routing and the sandbox escalation gate) resolve a question to a closed outcome and derive their own tool results from it. This is deliberately one package, not the capability-seam three (see Alternatives).
One package, `dsh-user-approval` (`packages/interaction/user-approval`), owns the vocabulary and the `ctx.approval` service — the mechanism. The policy — who answers, and whether a session is asked at all — lives outside it: answerers are `approval/request` waterfall listeners registered by channel-owning plugins (the ACP bridge, host adapters, and test scripts), and a per-session policy tier can decide before a channel is involved. Consumers (`dsh-tools`' ask routing and the sandbox escalation gate) resolve a question to a closed outcome and derive their own tool results from it. This is deliberately one package, not the capability-seam three (see Alternatives).
### How a deployment uses it
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Snapshots record allowed and rejected sandbox escalation through `session/reques
- **A single registered provider instead of waterfall listeners** — rejected: a `registerProvider()` surface forces every composition question — allowlist pre-filters, external hook deciders, scripted test answers, a policy gate in front of a human — inside one provider implementation. The waterfall gets composition, fail-closed absence, and HMR disposal from machinery the runtime already has; the seam's JSDoc pins the single-decision-slot convention instead of inventing a provider registry.
- **An inline `tools/pre-execute` permission gate in the ACP bridge** — rejected: prompting for every bridge-owned call hardwires the asking policy into the transport, cannot serve a second asker (sandbox escalation happens after execution starts, with no pre-execute moment), and leaves hook-produced `ask` decisions without a shared mechanism.
- **The generic user-interaction seam (`ctx.userInteraction`)** — rejected as the approval mechanism: the two share a skeleton (route by agent, block for a human, handle absence), but approval's contract is narrower in every dimension that matters: a closed outcome vocabulary instead of free text, a protocol-native prompt attached to a tool call instead of a generic form, mandatory fail-closed absence, and audit events. Approval therefore does not ride the shipped `packages/ui/user-interaction` / `ask_user_question` elicitation path — an elicitation form is not a permission prompt, and a free-text answer is not a closed outcome; sharing provider plumbing stays open if the two ever converge.
- **The generic user-interaction seam (`ctx.userInteraction`)** — rejected as the approval mechanism: the two share a skeleton (route by agent, block for a human, handle absence), but approval's contract is narrower in every dimension that matters: a closed outcome vocabulary instead of free text, a protocol-native prompt attached to a tool call instead of a generic form, mandatory fail-closed absence, and audit events. Approval therefore does not ride the shipped `packages/interaction/user-interaction` / `ask_user_question` elicitation path — an elicitation form is not a permission prompt, and a free-text answer is not a closed outcome; sharing provider plumbing stays open if the two ever converge.
- **Static optional injection in `dsh-tools`** — rejected: the vendored cordis `Inject` type has no optional flag — the object form maps service names to intercept config, and a declared inject gates the fiber. `ctx.get('approval')` is the documented opportunistic-consumption pattern (the `tool-bash` owner-token lookup, the loop's persistence probe), reads presence per call, and degrades correctly across HMR without extra machinery.
- **The capability-seam three-package split** — rejected: interface/implementation/consumer fits a seam whose implementation is swappable (bash-local vs bash-sandbox). Here the service body is fixed mechanism and the variable part is listeners that live with their owners — splitting would manufacture an implementation package with nothing in it ("don't split preemptively").
- **Offering `allow_always` now** — rejected: the protocol can express it, but honoring it means designing grant storage, scope identity, and revocation (§ Deferred). Advertising an option the harness cannot honor manufactures doomed grants.