Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/fix-clean-symlink-boundary

# Conflicts: # packages/support/llm-mock-server/tests/server.spec.ts
2026-07-26 21:33:44 +08:00
parent 5e4026d768 d9d55f0062
commit 4bcb52ea12
945 changed files with 26044 additions and 4486 deletions
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: d7e9d3d9b14fe723e3396c8167fe714b7613e2b5
-2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 8d2f16a46216cba8df0539be0abd2f1ad840eec3
+2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: ef100f96b06c454cfd1ec092cc7fd23e712bdf7a
+2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 4ace2b8c8a6b08e7721c1df8003ccfbdb128daf1
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The durability requirement was specific: the doc shows the **literal** current t

 - Complete type declarations and their JSDoc are pasted verbatim into a dedicated ` ```ts type-equiv ` fence. A concise ` ```ts public-api ` fence carries the source-equivalent ambient projection for a class whose implementation bodies do not belong in the catalog. `doc-typecheck` recognizes both and skips them (the bare declarations are not standalone-compilable), and **excludes them from the opt-out ratio** — they are a separately-checked category, not unchecked sketches.
 - A new `scripts/verify-type-equiv.ts` extracts each block via the TypeScript parser and asserts that its declaration structure and every JSDoc comment match the declared symbol, ignoring only formatting whitespace and non-JSDoc comments. Ordinary blocks retain the complete declaration. A `public-api` projection retains a class's public fields, constructor, accessors, and methods with their original JSDoc while removing implementation bodies and private or protected members. This is chosen over a compiled `_Check` assertion because source names and documentation identity, not assignability, are the properties the catalog preserves.
- Provenance lives in a central `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` (`{ doc, symbol, source }` entries), **not** in directive comments in the prose. The script enforces a **1:1 correspondence**: every type-equiv block has exactly one manifest entry and vice versa, so a block can never be silently unchecked and an entry can never rot.
+- Provenance lives in a central `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` (`{ doc, symbol, source }` entries), **not** in directive comments in the prose. The script enforces a **1:1 correspondence** between each primary type-equiv block and one manifest entry, so a block can never be silently unchecked and an entry can never rot. A paired `.zh.md` block reuses the unsuffixed sibling's entry only when the complete tracked fence sequence matches in order, kind, and byte-exact body; otherwise the gate checks it independently, finds no manifest entry, and fails.
 - Wired into `doc-sync`, so relevant documentation changes run it locally and CI runs it with the other documentation checks.

 ### Maintenance is the author's job, with a gate backstop
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Status: implemented

 - 完整的类型声明及其 JSDoc 会逐字粘贴到专用的 ` ```ts type-equiv ` 围栏中。简洁的 ` ```ts public-api ` 围栏承载与源码等价的类环境投影，用于实现体不应进入目录的类。`doc-typecheck` 会识别并跳过这两种围栏（裸声明无法独立编译），并且**将它们排除在 opt-out 比例之外**——它们是单独受检的类别，而不是未经检查的草图。
 - 新增的 `scripts/verify-type-equiv.ts` 通过 TypeScript 解析器提取每个块，并断言其声明结构和每条 JSDoc 注释都与所声明的符号匹配，只忽略格式空白和非 JSDoc 注释。普通块保留完整声明。`public-api` 投影保留类的公共字段、构造函数、访问器和方法及其原始 JSDoc，同时移除实现体以及私有或受保护成员。之所以选择它而非编译式 `_Check` 断言，是因为目录所保留的是源码名称与文档一致性，而不是可赋值性。
- 来源信息存放在集中的 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json`（`{ doc, symbol, source }` 条目）中，**而非**行文中的指令注释。脚本强制执行 **1:1 对应**：每个 type-equiv 块恰好有一条 manifest 条目，反之亦然；因此一个块永远不会被静默漏检，一条条目也永远不会腐烂。
+- 来源信息存放在集中的 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json`（`{ doc, symbol, source }` 条目）中，**而非**行文中的指令注释。脚本在每个主 type-equiv 块与一条 manifest 条目之间强制执行 **1:1 对应**，因此一个块永远不会被静默漏检，一条条目也永远不会腐烂。只有当配对 `.zh.md` 块的完整受跟踪围栏序列在顺序、类型和按字节精确的正文上均与无后缀兄弟文件匹配时，才会复用后者的条目；否则门禁会独立检查该块，发现没有 manifest 条目后失败。
 - 接入 `doc-sync`，因此相关文档变更会在本地运行它，CI 也会与其他文档检查一起运行它。

 ### 维护是作者的职责，门禁作为兜底
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 4bc02878a0ea3f998e411ecc2b064c1626eacf3c
-2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: 90a0c2f07f68b0fb4e26cd1c4b537a30a829b10f
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 3732e6812a3f1f40242aa5a83a0bf1d1bc4d6139
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: a870e063230a34b807eed2f4ffc1c6067cb3aedc
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)

 ## Problem

-This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
+This repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.

 ## Decision

 - **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).
 - **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
- **The enforcement frontier advances in coherent review batches.** A related set enters `required` only when reviewers can evaluate it as a unit. The core frontier groups [architecture](../../../../docs/architecture.md), the [Cordis primer](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md), [defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md), the [glossary](../../../../docs/glossary.md), and [testing](../../../../docs/testing.md) because their terminology, links, and contributor contracts inform one another; admitting only part would leave the enforced corpus internally inconsistent. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.
+- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
 - **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.
 - **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.

@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech conv
 - Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
 - When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
 - Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. A date-named document dated on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so new date-named Agent Notes do not enlarge that backlog.
+- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.
 - The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 问题

-本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
+本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。

 ## 决策

 - **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。
 - **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：required 的配对必须存在；任何已存在的配对必须完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）不得配对；凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest（元数据清单）中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，也必须有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退：每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中，覆盖面只增不减。
- **执行红线按连贯的评审批次推进。** 一组相关文档只有在评审者能够将其作为整体评估时，才进入 `required`。核心红线将[架构](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、[Cordis 入门](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md)、[防御性模式](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)、[术语表](../../../../docs/glossary.md)和[测试](../../../../docs/testing.md)归为一组，因为它们的术语、链接和贡献者契约相互关联；只纳入其中一部分会使受门禁约束的文档集合内部不一致。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对；每个现有配对都完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项，因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。
+- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对；政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
 - **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。
 - **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。

@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Status: implemented
 - 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
 - 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。
 - 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。
- 推进天然是渐进的：`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog（待翻清单，`--list`），而非红色的 CI；因此配对按可评审的批次落地，无需一个巨型 PR。凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest 中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，都必须配齐双语文件，因此新建的日期命名 Agent Note 不会增加这份 backlog。
+- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径，要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外，却看似已经强制执行。
 - 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: 7acdba8bfd96d183c418b3935d7b8e7f237d3607
-2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: 0f07a92740d31dd13cb523d73ac8a3699d666d30
+2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: a52c40a9a147fd39fdec4c61079822f1b1115227
+2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: d03c2046c9963e4d62d2a7221d4563f60d3f4953
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Standing docs accumulated repeated rules, retold incidents, duplicated package m

 - **A tier taxonomy with one home per fact.** [docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) is the documentation standard: it assigns every Markdown tier a single job (standing orders, system map, type catalog, decision records, incident stories, how-tos, per-package contracts, generated catalogs, workflows), forbids restating a fact outside its home tier (link instead), and carries the slop checklist used when writing or reviewing any doc.
 - **A narrow, hard budget gate.** [scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) joins `doc-sync`: every doc listed in [scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) must stay under its word ceiling (`wc -w` semantics, whole file), and a budgeted file that is missing fails the gate so a rename cannot silently orphan its budget. Scope is deliberately only the accretion-prone standing docs — the root and subtree `AGENTS.md` files, `architecture.md`, `packages/README.md`, and the standing policy docs they evict content into (`docs/testing.md`, `docs/defensive-patterns.md`). Reference docs, Agent Notes, and package READMEs are unbudgeted: length is legitimate there when every row is a fact, and review plus the slop checklist govern them.
- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600) — the same rollout mechanism as the [translation-pairing `required` list](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
+- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
 - **A thin workflow skill, contracts in docs.** [.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) carries the placement/audit/red-gate workflow and defers to the standard as its source of truth, the same split as [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) over the i18n contract.

 ## Alternatives considered
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented

 - **每项事实只归属一处的层级分类。**[docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) 是文档标准：它为每种 Markdown 层级分配单一职责（常设指令、系统图、类型目录、决策记录、事件故事、操作指南、各包契约、生成式目录、工作流），禁止在事实归属层级之外重复陈述（应改为链接），并包含编写或评审任何文档时使用的赘余检查清单。
 - **范围窄且严格的预算门禁。**[scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) 接入 `doc-sync`：[scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) 列出的每份文档都必须低于其字数上限（采用 `wc -w` 语义，统计整个文件）；预算内文件缺失也会使门禁失败，使重命名无法悄然遗落其预算。范围刻意只涵盖容易膨胀的常设文档——根目录和子树中的 `AGENTS.md` 文件、`architecture.md`、`packages/README.md`，以及它们将内容移入的常设策略文档（`docs/testing.md`、`docs/defensive-patterns.md`）。参考文档、Agent Note 和包 README 不设预算：只要每一行都是事实，长度在这些位置就是合理的；评审和赘余检查清单负责约束它们。
- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%（留出工作余量，使日常措辞调整能通过，而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁），并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量（根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词；`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800；子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600；`packages/README.md` ≤ 600）。推进机制与[翻译配对的 `required` 清单](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md)相同。门禁变红时，修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容；只有在 PR（Pull Request）描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限，manifest（元数据清单）的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
+- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%（留出工作余量，使日常措辞调整能通过，而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁），并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量（根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词；`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800；子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600；`packages/README.md` ≤ 600）。门禁变红时，修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容；只有在 PR（Pull Request）描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限，manifest（元数据清单）的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
 - **精简的工作流 skill（技能），契约归文档。**[.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) 承载放置/审计/红灯门禁工作流，并以文档标准为真源，与 [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 和 i18n 契约之间的分工相同。

 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
+2026-07-13-documentation-site-projection.md: 2452c9dfa53e05061446df2fe650f3b4d6428c01
+2026-07-13-documentation-site-projection.zh.md: 9df230ea8adeb8744387a5f7efdf288d6a1f6eaa
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

 Status: implemented

+English | [中文](2026-07-13-documentation-site-projection.zh.md)
+
 ## Problem

 The repository needs a navigable documentation website without turning the website directory into a second documentation source. Copying package guides, architecture pages, or generated catalogs into a site-specific tree allows the two copies to drift, while pointing VitePress directly at the repository root couples public URLs and navigation to the internal file layout. Repository-relative links also need different destinations on the website: published pages stay inside the site, but source files and unpublished contributor documents belong on GitHub.
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Agent Note: 将规范文档投影到网站
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-13-documentation-site-projection.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+仓库需要一个可导航的文档网站，但不能让网站目录成为第二个文档源。把包（package）指南、架构页面或生成目录复制到网站专用目录树，会使两份副本发生漂移；让 VitePress 直接指向仓库根目录，又会把公开 URL 和导航与内部文件布局耦合。仓库相对链接在网站上也需要指向不同位置：已发布页面应留在站内，源文件和未发布的贡献者文档则应指向 GitHub。
+
+## 决策
+
+规范 Markdown 保留在拥有它的仓库层级中。面向产品的指南位于 `docs/user/`，生成的参考资料保留在现有生成目录中，架构页面和实操手册（cookbook）页面也保留在现有的 `docs/` 路径。
+
+`website/docs.ts` 是一份显式的发布 manifest（元数据清单）。每个条目将一个规范源文件映射到稳定的公开路由、侧边栏、分区和顺序。因此，新增或移除已发布页面是一项可评审的 manifest 变更，而不是隐式目录扫描的结果。
+
+在 VitePress 启动或构建之前，`scripts/project-doc-site.ts` 会把 manifest 投影到被忽略的 `website/.generated/` 目录。生成目录树遵循公开路由，使 VitePress 导航、locale 检测和本地搜索使用同一套路由词汇。每个页面都会获得一个指向其规范仓库文件的 `editSource` frontmatter 字段；编辑链接回调只读取该页面的数据，因此公开 URL 与源文件布局彼此独立。
+
+各 locale 的首页投影只保留规范 YAML frontmatter。面向仓库的正文可以保留其 H1 和双语源文件链接，而 VitePress 首页主题负责渲染 hero 与功能区，网站导航负责切换 locale。
+
+投影器解析 Markdown 链接，但不会重新序列化文档。指向另一个已发布源文件的链接会变成站内相对路由；指向未发布仓库文件的链接会变成 GitHub 源文件链接；仓库图片会变成 GitHub raw URL。相对目标不存在时，投影快速失败。单元测试固定这些转换，`docs:check` 则运行投影器测试和 VitePress 生产构建，并将二者纳入 `doc-sync` 和并行文档门禁。
+
+`website/AGENTS.md` 是网站子树中唯一维护的 Markdown 文件。投影器测试会枚举已跟踪且未被忽略的文件，并拒绝网站中的任何其他 Markdown，因此网站专用的 locale、路由、API 或生成源文件副本无法绕过发布 manifest。
+
+Mermaid 渲染规范图表。网站工作区显式声明 `vitepress-plugin-mermaid` 要求 Vite 预打包的 5 个包，因为 pnpm 的严格依赖隔离会使本地开发服务器无法使用这些传递依赖；Knip 将这种仅运行时使用记录为有意的依赖例外。
+
+网站发布与网站构建保持分离。专用 GitHub Actions 工作流运行现有文档门禁，将 `website/.dist` 作为 Pages 产物上传，并只在构建成功后部署。`actions/configure-pages` 在构建时向 VitePress 提供目标位置的 base path，因此私有 Pages 源站、未来的公开项目路径和自定义域名不需要各自的检入配置。Pages 可见性仍是仓库托管设置，而不是工作流权限。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+**在 `website/` 下提交复制的 Markdown。** 这种方式让 VitePress 设置更直接，但每份复制的指南或 API 表格都会多出一个所有者，并且需要一套无法识别权威副本的同步约定。
+
+**让 `website/` 成为每个已发布页面的规范归属。** 这种方式仍只有一份副本，却只是为了满足渲染器，就把架构、生成的参考资料和面向贡献者的材料移出了各自的仓库归属层级。
+
+**自动发现所有 Markdown 文件。** 这种方式最大限度减少 manifest 维护，却会意外发布内部文档、把源文件移动暴露为 URL 变更，并根据偶然的目录顺序生成导航。
+
+**使用文件系统符号链接。** 符号链接保留单一来源，却无法解决公开路由或仓库相对链接问题，而且在本地开发、包工具和托管 CI 环境中的行为不够可预测。
+
+**只在部署工作流中构建。** 部署作业可以在合并后发现渲染故障。把生产构建纳入 `doc-sync`，则无论是否存在公开部署，同一个故障都能在本地和常规 CI 中暴露。
+
+**硬编码公开项目路径。** 固定的 `/deepseek-harness/` base 适用于公开项目 URL，却不适用于私有 Pages 站点分配的唯一源站，也不适用于未来的自定义域名。使用 Pages 元数据可让这些目标位置共享同一份构建契约。
+
+## 后果
+
+文档事实只有一个可编辑归属，公开路由在源文件移动后仍保持稳定，网站也能纳入生成的参考资料而无需提交另一份生成副本。本地开发会监视规范输入并重新生成一次性投影。布局门禁会把陈旧的网站专用 Markdown 目录树变成合并失败，而不是被忽略的构建输入。影响文档网站的合并会把检查过的结果部署到 Pages，手动触发则提供恢复与验证入口。
+
+发布 manifest 是一份需要维护的 allowlist，链接投影也引入了一层仓库专用的构建适配器。新增一种 Markdown 链接行为时，需要增加投影器测试。Mermaid 支持也会增大客户端 bundle，但能保留规范文档中已经使用的图表。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.md: 32d7408b3d56e6571a14a8191e9b4b0fe901f5a3
-2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.zh.md: 713845706e650b4b4acd591368d9bcff137a38b7
+2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.md: 162ae61affb4c1b0ad526fa0da41f84ebbb02089
+2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.zh.md: cd015ba62f1f2b1e9e5e6c36d1cde5bd35cba84c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Every non-trivial change adds or updates at least one Agent Note in the same PR.

 Updating the note that already owns a decision satisfies the rule; a new note is required only when no note owns it. Purely mechanical or local edits with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change are exempt. The [Agent Notes README](../../README.md#when-to-write-one) owns this boundary, while root `AGENTS.md` carries the standing order.

-A fully superseded implemented note may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted only after that owner preserves every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap. The same change repairs inbound links and removes any Chinese counterpart, consistency record, and `required` entry in `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json`. Partial supersession keeps both notes cross-linked and current; consolidation neither rewrites an old decision into its opposite nor leaves git history as the only copy of rationale.
+A fully superseded implemented note may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted only after that owner preserves every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap. The same change repairs inbound links and removes the Chinese counterpart and consistency record. Partial supersession keeps both notes cross-linked and current; consolidation neither rewrites an old decision into its opposite nor leaves git history as the only copy of rationale.

 When a later decision removes an earlier feature completely, the removal note becomes the current owner only after the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the feature's original motivation, why that motivation no longer justified the surface, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Implementation inventories and tests that only described the deleted behavior are obsolete rather than current verification contracts. A removal limited to one transport, default, implementation, or presentation remains partial supersession.

@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ Review enforces the semantic boundary. No automated gate attempts to classify a
 - Contributors maintain an existing owning note instead of creating duplicate records.
 - Fully superseded records can collapse into one current owner without losing their unique rationale or verification contract.
 - Features that were later removed can have one current owner without carrying obsolete implementation and test inventories forward.
- Partial supersession remains explicit and cross-linked, while deletion requires link, bilingual-pair, and required-manifest cleanup in the same change.
+- Partial supersession remains explicit and cross-linked, while deletion requires link and bilingual-pair cleanup in the same change.
 - Mechanical edits remain lightweight, and the gate topology and runtime remain unchanged.
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented

 更新已经持有该决策的 Agent Note 即满足规则；仅当没有 Agent Note 持有该决策时才新增记录。完全机械或局部、且不改变行为、契约、结构、流程或决策依据的编辑可豁免。[Agent Notes README](../../README.md#when-to-write-one) 持有这条边界，根目录 `AGENTS.md` 则携带常驻指令。

-只有在当前持有该决策的记录保存了所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口后，才可将被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 合并到该记录中并删除。同一变更还要修复入站链接，并删除中文对侧文件、一致性记录，以及 `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json` 中对应的 `required` 条目。仅部分被取代时，两个记录仍需互相链接并保持与现状一致；合并既不将旧决策改写成与其相反的决策，也不让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
+只有在当前持有该决策的记录保存了所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口后，才可将被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 合并到该记录中并删除。同一变更还要修复入站链接，并删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代时，两个记录仍需互相链接并保持与现状一致；合并既不将旧决策改写成与其相反的决策，也不让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。

 后续决策完全移除较早的功能时，只有该功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行，移除记录才会成为当前持有记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。它必须保留该功能的最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明继续保留该功能、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。只描述已删除行为的实现清单和测试已经过时，不属于当前验证契约。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示仍属于部分取代。

@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ Status: implemented
 - 贡献者维护现有的决策持有记录，而不是创建重复记录。
 - 被完全取代的记录可以归并到一个当前持有记录中，同时不丢失其独有的决策依据或验证契约。
 - 后来被移除的功能可以只有一个当前持有记录，而无需继续保留过时的实现与测试清单。
- 仅部分被取代的情况仍需明确记录并互相链接；删除记录则必须在同一变更中清理链接、双语配对和 `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json` 的 `required` 条目。
+- 仅部分被取代的情况仍需明确记录并互相链接；删除记录则必须在同一变更中清理链接和双语配对。
 - 机械编辑仍保持轻量，门禁拓扑和运行时间也保持不变。
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
+2026-07-25-semantic-pr-label-taxonomy.md: 61b7a829b8c44836cf9c6d0d8a7df463df309d89
+2026-07-25-semantic-pr-label-taxonomy.zh.md: cc0c5e7a8953bc97de51f90349a0e2542be5b77e
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# Agent Note: Semantic pull request label taxonomy
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-07-25-semantic-pr-label-taxonomy.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Pull requests need two different signals: what kind of change they make and which repository domains they affect. A flat or broadly named label set conflates those questions, hides work in distinct areas such as `session` and `llm`, and gives reviewers and automation weak inputs.
+
+The repository also gains new domains over time. Treating today's area labels as a closed set would force future work into inaccurate labels or a generic catch-all.
+
+## Decision
+
+Every open or merged pull request carries exactly one kind and every materially affected area. Closed pull requests that were never merged are outside the maintained historical corpus. Other operational labels may coexist, but they do not satisfy either dimension.
+
+### Kinds
+
+| Kind | Meaning |
+|---|---|
+| `feature` | Adds or intentionally changes behavior. |
+| `bug-fix` | Corrects incorrect behavior. |
+| `doc` | Makes documentation the dominant intent. |
+| `testing` | Changes tests or testing infrastructure without changing product behavior. |
+| `cleanup` | Preserves behavior while maintaining or simplifying the implementation or repository process. |
+
+The kind records the change's dominant intent: accompanying tests and documentation do not turn a feature or bug fix into a testing or documentation change.
+
+Areas record semantic repository domains rather than temporary initiatives, ownership, or every path touched incidentally. Area labels are not a hierarchy: a pull request may carry several when it changes distinct contracts, but an umbrella and a narrower label do not both describe the same work.
+
+### Current areas
+
+The 45 current areas are listed below. The group names organize the list for readability; they are not labels or another taxonomy level.
+
+| Group | Areas |
+|---|---|
+| Agent and model | `agent`, `agent-loop`, `session`, `llm`, `model-context`, `compaction`, `tools`, `persistence` |
+| Orchestration | `subagent`, `workflow`, `planning`, `tasks`, `schedule`, `telemetry`, `storage`, `workspace` |
+| Capabilities | `bash`, `pty`, `filesystem`, `lsp`, `skills`, `web-search`, `code-mode`, `artifact`, `attachment`, `sandbox`, `mcp`, `hooks`, `cordis` |
+| Interfaces | `ui`, `gui`, `tui`, `acp`, `json-rpc`, `cli`, `python-sdk`, `vscode`, `website` |
+| Repository and release | `dev-infra`, `ci`, `build`, `dependencies`, `platform`, `i18n`, `release` |
+
+`gui` covers browser and Electron graphical applications, including standalone graphical developer tools; `vscode` remains the editor extension integration. `ui` covers shared cross-interface commands, approval interaction, presentation, and app boot; it coexists with `gui`, `tui`, or a protocol area only when the pull request also changes that shared contract.
+
+`tasks` owns background work tied to a running process, while `schedule` owns durable time-triggered jobs. `tools` owns generic registry, schema, and execution contracts; a concrete capability receives `tools` only when it changes one of those contracts. `attachment` owns durable media references and multimodal input delivery, while `artifact` owns model-declared deliverable identity and preview lifecycle; neither borrows `tools` or `ui` for its implementation parts.
+
+Names follow semantic ownership rather than lexical resemblance. `hooks` means the Claude Code and Codex agent bridges, not local Git hooks; `platform` means product portability, not CI runner selection; and `build` means compilation, bundling, and built package artifacts, not documentation generators.
+
+### Extensibility
+
+The area set is intentionally extensible. Add an area when a recurring, meaningful repository domain is missing; do not add a label for one pull request, a temporary project, a status, or a person or team. Rename, split, or retire an area when the domain model changes, and update this list and the affected open and merged pull requests together.
+
+The kind set stays narrow because kinds are mutually exclusive. A new kind requires a distinct change intent that cannot be represented by the current five; it is not a substitute for an area.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- **One undifferentiated label set.** Rejected because kind and area answer different questions; mixing them makes the presence of one label say nothing about whether the other dimension was considered.
+- **A fixed, closed area set.** Rejected because repository domains evolve. A closed set would preserve spelling at the cost of semantic accuracy.
+- **One broad `core` area or package-derived labels.** Rejected because domains such as `session`, `llm`, and `agent` remain independently meaningful across package boundaries, while incidental file paths are not the scope reviewers or automation need.
+- **Separate browser and desktop areas.** Rejected because browser delivery and Electron packaging expose one graphical client domain; splitting them classifies the delivery shell rather than the semantic work.
+- **Broad implementation areas in place of a domain.** Rejected because a durable scheduled job is not a background task, an attachment is not merely its source interface or filesystem implementation, and an artifact is not merely its declaring tool or preview interface.
+- **Umbrella and leaf areas for the same contract.** Rejected because duplicate labels inflate scope without adding information. Multiple areas remain correct when a pull request changes genuinely distinct contracts.
+- **Exactly one area per pull request.** Rejected because coherent changes can legitimately span several domains, and dropping secondary areas hides affected contracts.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Reviewers and automation receive one stable intent signal plus a complete semantic scope.
+- `gui` queries cover browser and desktop delivery together, while `ui` queries retain only shared cross-interface contracts.
+- `schedule`, `attachment`, and `artifact` queries identify those domains directly instead of approximating them through implementation dependencies.
+- Selecting labels remains a judgment call: paths and title prefixes can suggest areas, but they cannot replace reading the change.
+- Taxonomy changes carry maintenance work. Area additions, renames, splits, and removals update this decision record and backfill open and merged pull requests so historical queries keep their meaning.
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# Agent Note: 语义化 PR 标签分类体系
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-07-25-semantic-pr-label-taxonomy.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+PR（Pull Request）需要传达两个不同的信号：它带来哪一类变更，以及会影响仓库中的哪些领域。一套扁平或命名宽泛的标签会混淆这两个问题，掩盖 `session`、`llm` 等不同领域的工作，也让评审人和自动化流程得到的输入缺乏有效信息。
+
+仓库还会随时间发展出新的领域。如果把当前的领域标签视为封闭集合，未来的工作就只能归入不准确的标签或通用兜底标签。
+
+## 决策
+
+每项开放或已合并的 PR 都带有恰好一个类型标签，以及所有受到实质影响的领域标签。未合并即关闭的 PR 不属于持续维护的历史记录集合。其他管理用途的标签可以并存，但都不能满足这两个维度中的任一个。
+
+### 类型
+
+| 类型 | 含义 |
+|---|---|
+| `feature` | 新增行为或有意改变行为。 |
+| `bug-fix` | 修正错误行为。 |
+| `doc` | 以文档变更为主要意图。 |
+| `testing` | 修改测试或测试基础设施，但不改变产品行为。 |
+| `cleanup` | 在保持行为不变的前提下，维护或简化实现或仓库流程。 |
+
+类型记录变更的主要意图：配套测试与文档并不会把一项功能或缺陷修复变成测试或文档变更。
+
+领域记录仓库中的语义领域，而不是临时项目、归属关系或偶然触及的每条路径。领域标签不构成层级：一项 PR 修改不同契约时可以带有多个领域标签，但不能用一个总括标签和一个较窄标签重复描述同一项工作。
+
+### 当前领域
+
+当前的 45 个领域如下。分组名称仅用于提高列表的可读性；它们既不是标签，也不是分类体系中的另一个层级。
+
+| 分组 | 领域 |
+|---|---|
+| agent（智能体）与模型 | `agent`, `agent-loop`, `session`, `llm`, `model-context`, `compaction`, `tools`, `persistence` |
+| 编排 | `subagent`, `workflow`, `planning`, `tasks`, `schedule`, `telemetry`, `storage`, `workspace` |
+| 能力 | `bash`, `pty`, `filesystem`, `lsp`, `skills`, `web-search`, `code-mode`, `artifact`, `attachment`, `sandbox`, `mcp`, `hooks`, `cordis` |
+| 接口 | `ui`, `gui`, `tui`, `acp`, `json-rpc`, `cli`, `python-sdk`, `vscode`, `website` |
+| 仓库与发布 | `dev-infra`, `ci`, `build`, `dependencies`, `platform`, `i18n`, `release` |
+
+`gui` 涵盖浏览器和 Electron 图形应用，包括独立的图形化开发者工具；`vscode` 仍表示编辑器扩展集成。`ui` 涵盖共享的跨接口命令、审批交互、呈现和应用启动；只有当 PR 还修改这项共享契约时，它才与 `gui`、`tui` 或某个协议领域并用。
+
+`tasks` 负责与运行中进程绑定的后台工作，`schedule` 则负责持久化的定时作业。`tools` 负责通用的注册表契约、schema 契约和执行契约；具体能力只有在修改其中一项契约时才带有 `tools`。`attachment` 负责持久化的媒体引用和多模态输入传递，`artifact` 则负责模型声明的交付物标识和预览生命周期；二者都不会因实现包含工具或界面部分而借用 `tools` 或 `ui`。
+
+标签名称以语义归属为准，而不是词面相似性。`hooks` 指 Claude Code 和 Codex 的 agent 桥接，而不是本地 Git 钩子；`platform` 指产品可移植性，而不是 CI 运行器选择；`build` 指编译、打包和已构建的包（package）产物，而不是文档生成器。
+
+### 可扩展性
+
+领域集合有意保持可扩展。当分类体系缺少一个会反复涉及且具有实际意义的仓库领域时，就新增领域；不要仅为一项 PR、临时项目、状态、个人或团队新增标签。当领域模型发生变化时，重命名、拆分或退役相应领域，同时更新本列表以及所有受影响的开放和已合并 PR。
+
+类型集合保持精简，因为各类型互斥。新增类型的前提是存在一种当前五类无法表达的独立变更意图；类型不能用来替代领域。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **一套不区分维度的标签。** 不予采纳，因为类型与领域回答的是不同问题；两者混在一起时，存在一个维度的标签并不表示另一个维度也经过了考虑。
+- **一套固定、封闭的领域集合。** 不予采纳，因为仓库领域会持续演变。封闭集合会以牺牲语义准确性为代价来维持拼写不变。
+- **一个宽泛的 `core` 领域，或从包结构派生的标签。** 不予采纳，因为 `session`、`llm` 和 `agent` 等领域在跨越包边界时仍各自具有意义，而偶然涉及的文件路径并不是评审人或自动化流程所需的范围信息。
+- **为浏览器和桌面端分别设置领域。** 不予采纳，因为浏览器交付和 Electron 打包共同呈现同一个图形客户端领域；拆开二者将按交付形态而非工作的语义进行分类。
+- **以宽泛的实现领域替代语义领域。** 不予采纳，因为持久化的定时作业不是后台任务，附件不只是其来源接口或文件系统实现，产物也不只是声明它的工具或预览接口。
+- **同一项契约同时使用总括领域与细分领域。** 不予采纳，因为重复标签只会虚增范围，不会增加信息。一项 PR 确实修改不同契约时，多个领域标签仍然合理。
+- **每项 PR 恰好一个领域。** 不予采纳，因为一项内聚的变更可以合理地跨越多个领域；省略次要领域会隐藏受影响的契约。
+
+## 后果
+
+- 评审人和自动化流程获得一个稳定的意图信号，以及完整的语义范围。
+- `gui` 查询会同时覆盖浏览器与桌面端交付，`ui` 查询则只涵盖共享的跨接口契约。
+- `schedule`、`attachment` 与 `artifact` 查询直接对应各自领域，无需通过实现依赖近似归类。
+- 选择标签仍然需要判断：路径和标题前缀可以提示领域，但不能替代阅读变更内容。
+- 变更分类体系会产生维护工作。新增、重命名、拆分或移除领域时，需要更新本决策记录，并回填开放和已合并的 PR，使历史查询保持原有含义。