Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

feat(tui): personal TUI rework, integrating upstream model reasoning-effort selection

Browse Source 
Consolidates the personal dsh-tui customizations (module split into
components/session/extension, prompt template + running-glyph indicator,
copyable transcript, tool-card headers, timing placement, XML tool output,
status/footer rework) and ports upstream's model reasoning-effort selector
(Shift+Tab effort cycling, effort-aware /model, footer, and /status) onto
the personal module layout.
This commit is contained in:
Turtle
2026-07-27 17:53:40 +08:00
parent 5d2329e207
commit 4c5f92e0fd
139 changed files with 7491 additions and 3792 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-skill-slash-command.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`](../../../../packages/ui/tui/README.md) front door o
The TUI reads the skill service through `ctx.get('skills')`, not a declared injection, because skills mount conditionally: a deployment without the registry keeps a working front door, and `/skill:` there reports that skills are unavailable rather than failing to mount. `createTuiChat` is synchronous while `ctx.skills.list()` is async, so autocomplete seeds the static slash commands immediately and rebuilds the provider with `skill:<name>` entries once the catalog resolves; a resolution that arrives after disposal is dropped, and a rejected lookup keeps the base commands.
Autocomplete lists only model-invocable skills — it is built from `list()`, which omits `disableModelInvocation` skills — while manual submission resolves through `get()`, which the skill registry documents as the trusted-caller path that returns disabled skills too. So a person can load any skill by typing its exact name, but the completion menu never advertises a skill the model is meant not to see. An unknown name, an empty name after the prefix, and a lookup failure each surface as a transcript notice without sending anything.
Autocomplete lists only model-invocable skills — it is built from `list()`, which omits `disableModelInvocation` skills — while manual submission resolves through `get()`, which the skill registry documents as the trusted-caller path that returns disabled skills too. So a person can load any skill by typing its exact name, but the completion menu never advertises a skill the model is meant not to see. Each completion entry is labeled with its winning source's scope — `(project)` for the `project-` sources, `(user)` for every other source — in the slash-command argument-hint slot, which the menu shows but selection never inserts, so trailing instructions still follow the completed name. An unknown name, an empty name after the prefix, and a lookup failure each surface as a transcript notice without sending anything.
`renderSkillInvocation` and the resource-base line are the TUI's own, deliberately not reused from `dsh-tool-skill`'s `skill` tool result. The tool wraps a body in `<skill_content>`/`<skill_resources>`/`<skill_instructions>` for a *tool result*; a manual invocation is a *user turn*, and coupling the two renderers would force one model-facing shape to serve both surfaces. The cost is two renderers that both format a skill body; the benefit is that each surface's model-facing text evolves independently, and each is pinned where it is produced.