docs: repair rewritten rationale and stale claims from the ACP reduction

The automation-only rewrite edited many implemented Agent Notes; several
edits replaced still-live or historical rationale instead of reframing:

- llm-model-catalog: restore the prompt/request consistency section and
  selection-ownership alternatives — installAgentLlmTarget and the TUI
  /model selector still ship that design; only the ACP wire is gone.
- plan-specific-collaboration-state, acp-multi-session, todo-write,
  ask-user-question: link the superseding automation-only note instead
  of silently rewriting the original decision or motivation; drop a
  paragraph duplicating the Web-provider facts stated two paragraphs up.
- sandbox: stop claiming unit coverage for turn-enclosed config writes
  (that mechanism left with the bridge) and retitle the commit-boundary
  paragraph accordingly.
- Fix the missing blank line before '## Consequences' in the
  plugin-command-registration pair, the JSON-RPC/Web render-intent
  consumer misattribution (the second consumer is the host/client
  runtime), stale bash_output/bash_kill names, and 'optional goals' in
  architecture.md.
- examples/acp-agent/README.md: point at the package contract instead
  of restating it; packages/ui/permission and plan-mode READMEs record
  the consumer-less preset service and the exit_plan_mode coverage gap
  under Known Limitations.
- 2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests: the new note defers the corpus
  migration rather than committing to it; say so.

Re-record the touched bilingual pairs.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-24 22:12:23 +08:00
parent 74d14f68bb
commit 5569f3f8ac
23 changed files with 66 additions and 37 deletions
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
> Written when ACP was an editor bridge, motivated by Zed's multi-session client model. [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) removed the editor surfaces; the multiplexing decision itself is unchanged and this note now states it against the automation contract.
## Problem
An ACP automation client can keep several conversations alive over one agent subprocess. A single-active-session bridge would force extra processes and prevent one parent controller from driving independent children over one connection. Multiplexing introduces isolation risks: committed answers, prompt completion, cancellation, permission requests, and predictable background-task ids must never cross session boundaries.
@@ -14,7 +16,7 @@ Every `session/event` callback resolves the owning record before sending or sett
Permission ownership uses the same exact-agent check against the forward map. The ACP `approval/request` answerer sends a one-shot machine-policy request only for the session that owns the requesting agent and delegates foreign or call-less requests. The bridge has no elicitation, config-selection, or other human-interaction state.
Background bash tasks carry an opaque owner token equal to the owning session id. `bash_output` and `bash_kill` compare the caller's token with the executor's task ownership before reading or killing; a predictable task id alone grants no access. Ownership is stored with the executor task, so a tool plugin reload does not erase it.
Background bash tasks carry an opaque owner token equal to the owning session id. `task_output` and `task_kill` compare the caller's token with the executor's task ownership before reading or killing; a predictable task id alone grants no access. Ownership is stored with the executor task, so a tool plugin reload does not erase it.
Connection teardown clears the live map, settles each pending prompt as cancelled, and disposes all `AgentHandle`s in parallel. Each handle stops and awaits its loop, flushes the session while attached, unregisters the agent, and removes the session. Teardown is memoized and shared by client disconnect and plugin disposal.
@@ -42,4 +44,4 @@ The bridge exposes no protocol method to close one live session independently. R
## Verification
The multi-session suite drives concurrent sessions through routed committed answers, independent in-flight prompts, targeted cancellation, permission routing, exact-agent rejection, and shared teardown. Tool-bash tests prove one session cannot read or kill another session's background task.
The multi-session suite drives concurrent sessions through routed committed answers, independent in-flight prompts, targeted cancellation, and shared teardown; the approval and output-boundary suites cover permission routing and exact-agent rejection. Tool-bash tests prove one session cannot read or kill another session's background task.