docs: repair rewritten rationale and stale claims from the ACP reduction
The automation-only rewrite edited many implemented Agent Notes; several edits replaced still-live or historical rationale instead of reframing: - llm-model-catalog: restore the prompt/request consistency section and selection-ownership alternatives — installAgentLlmTarget and the TUI /model selector still ship that design; only the ACP wire is gone. - plan-specific-collaboration-state, acp-multi-session, todo-write, ask-user-question: link the superseding automation-only note instead of silently rewriting the original decision or motivation; drop a paragraph duplicating the Web-provider facts stated two paragraphs up. - sandbox: stop claiming unit coverage for turn-enclosed config writes (that mechanism left with the bridge) and retitle the commit-boundary paragraph accordingly. - Fix the missing blank line before '## Consequences' in the plugin-command-registration pair, the JSON-RPC/Web render-intent consumer misattribution (the second consumer is the host/client runtime), stale bash_output/bash_kill names, and 'optional goals' in architecture.md. - examples/acp-agent/README.md: point at the package contract instead of restating it; packages/ui/permission and plan-mode READMEs record the consumer-less preset service and the exit_plan_mode coverage gap under Known Limitations. - 2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests: the new note defers the corpus migration rather than committing to it; say so. Re-record the touched bilingual pairs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ TUI 测试覆盖全部迁移后的内置命令、实时插件发现、帮助与
|
||||
- **为每个定义附加适配器掩码**——不予采纳,因为支持能力是组合事实,而不是命令领域状态。每个已组合适配器都暴露已注册命令;不兼容插件不会在该部署中注册。
|
||||
- **把未知斜杠输入发送给模型**——不予采纳,因为输入错误或不可用的直接操作必须可预测地失败,而不能改变执行平面。
|
||||
- **持久化通用命令输入与输出**——不予采纳,因为适配器提示不是模型可见状态。改变持久行为的处理器会调用拥有该状态的领域 API,由后者记录自己的事件。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 命令生产者是普通的可移除插件,TUI 消费其经过校验的目录与分派契约。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user