docs: repair rewritten rationale and stale claims from the ACP reduction

The automation-only rewrite edited many implemented Agent Notes; several
edits replaced still-live or historical rationale instead of reframing:

- llm-model-catalog: restore the prompt/request consistency section and
  selection-ownership alternatives — installAgentLlmTarget and the TUI
  /model selector still ship that design; only the ACP wire is gone.
- plan-specific-collaboration-state, acp-multi-session, todo-write,
  ask-user-question: link the superseding automation-only note instead
  of silently rewriting the original decision or motivation; drop a
  paragraph duplicating the Web-provider facts stated two paragraphs up.
- sandbox: stop claiming unit coverage for turn-enclosed config writes
  (that mechanism left with the bridge) and retitle the commit-boundary
  paragraph accordingly.
- Fix the missing blank line before '## Consequences' in the
  plugin-command-registration pair, the JSON-RPC/Web render-intent
  consumer misattribution (the second consumer is the host/client
  runtime), stale bash_output/bash_kill names, and 'optional goals' in
  architecture.md.
- examples/acp-agent/README.md: point at the package contract instead
  of restating it; packages/ui/permission and plan-mode READMEs record
  the consumer-less preset service and the exit_plan_mode coverage gap
  under Known Limitations.
- 2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests: the new note defers the corpus
  migration rather than committing to it; say so.

Re-record the touched bilingual pairs.

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.zh.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Plan mode 拥有一个 plan 专用产品包：位于 `packages/plan/plan-mode/`
 
 配置严格为 `{ section: string }`。该包自行注册固定的 `plan:policy` 段、`/plan [message]`、精确匹配的 `/plan off` 主动退出形式，以及 `exit_plan_mode`。不带参数的 `/plan` 选择激活；其他非空参数则先选择激活，再通过 `agent.steer()` 发送去除首尾空白后的文本，使该文本在受影响的步骤中成为一条记录到日志的普通用户消息。`/plan off` 选择未激活，不产生模型输入，并可取消仍待在边界生效的进入选择。即使 plan mode 未激活，退出工具仍保持注册，以确保请求工具目录稳定。
 
-面向人类的组合拥有 plan 选择与评审。ACP 自动化组合既不挂载 plan mode，也不提供模式选择协议，因此其传输层不会扩大这套产品专用词汇。
+面向人类的组合拥有 plan 选择与评审。本笔记最初把 ACP 协议级的 `default`/`plan` 选择器保留为布尔服务之上的适配器；[ACP 作为仅面向自动化的协议](2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)取代了那个线上投影，因此 ACP 组合现在既不挂载 plan mode，也不提供模式选择协议。
 
 沙箱模式与审批策略仍是彼此独立的强制约束轴。Plan mode 既不读取也不写入二者；此次简化也没有为这些概念引入共享基类型、注册表或预设抽象。