fix(web): keep the plan card to decisions it can actually answer

Review follow-ups on the presentation intent.

The card claimed any single-question request declaring the intent, then sent one
of two labels — so a producer offering a third option, or a multi-select batch,
lost answers the generic flow would have shown. That contradicts the intent's
own contract, so `planReviewOf` now claims only a binary single choice and
leaves everything else to the flow that can express it.

`ask()` also rejects a plan-review intent on a question with no `detail`: the
intent declares detail IS the plan, and without one a honouring UI asks the
user to approve something invisible. The client keeps its own fallback — it sits
downstream of a wire boundary — but the misconfiguration now fails at the asker.

`planReviewOf` stops being a value export of the client contract face (client
export discipline: pure helpers stay internal; the tests already import it
relatively), and the ui-question README fallback list, both languages, now
states every condition the code enforces.

packages/client/ui-question/README.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write packages/client/ui-question/README.md
-README.md: 6b40c503be61c2458cefceabbb35e16a3befbe66
-README.zh.md: 7c0c4ee67d1ef8b4507f3899bdb1ae2f76408032
+README.md: 5ebba2a1da6e6108b82e9deb235b84f987600345
+README.zh.md: 0aa6428a9b6472fc5b525c11b4716ebc50c378c3