fix(host): preserve subagent continuation ownership

2026-07-31 22:48:30 +08:00
parent 1aedb23ca6
commit 9a7be21b7f
29 changed files with 514 additions and 101 deletions
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ A bracket owner reads it positionally: an unmatched opening marker before `sessi

 The constructor is the placement because it is the single waist every seeded session passes through. All six entry points reach it: `agents.resume()`, config-driven startup on a persisted id (`restoreOrCreateConfigured`), `sessions.fork()`, a subagent fork child, `coordinator.adopt()`'s live-prefix path, and a bare `sessions.create(id, {seed})`. A boundary written at persistence load would miss both fork paths — and a forked child inheriting a still-running parent's open `compact/start` is precisely the case that must be classifiable. A boundary written at loop start would miss `fork()` and `adopt()`, and would have to fire on `SessionStartSource: 'startup'`, which is what a fork child publishes, so that field would stop discriminating.

-Two guards keep the marker precise. An omitted seed writes nothing because the session is fresh. A seed already ending in one is not re-marked, which makes the write idempotent. Idempotence is load-bearing rather than tidiness — `agentFor()` resumes a cold session on first touch, so merely opening one in a client is a pickup, and without the guard browsing would grow a log by one event per visit.
+Two guards keep the marker precise. An omitted seed writes nothing because the session is fresh. A seed already ending in one is not re-marked, which makes the write idempotent. Idempotence is load-bearing rather than tidiness: each Agent-bound pickup of a cold session passes through `agentFor()`, and without the guard repeated controls would grow the log even when they perform no work. The inspection-only `session.history` and `session.fork` source paths do not create this boundary in the source.

 ## Persistence needs no changes