refactor: unify the Code Mode demos on base-plus-overlay

Both demo:code-mode UIs now share one mechanism: the base example plus a
same-shaped code-mode.cordis.yml include overlay (insert the worker
runtime, flip tools.mode). Previously the REPL side was a hand-forked
example (examples/code-agent) that had also silently diverged — it
dropped compaction and the subagent stack — so the demo's UI argument
switched agents, not just surfaces. The fork is retired: coding-agent
gains the overlay, a Code Mode README section absorbing code-agent's,
and both of its tests (the keyless boot guard, retargeted at the
overlay; the with-key RFC proof, which hand-mounts its own harness and
moves untouched). The RFC's composed-surface and e2e-tier lines, the
examples index, the AGENTS.md smoke table, and the dsh-tools README
link now describe the overlay shape.

Verified live: overlay keyless smoke, with-key code-mode e2e from its
new home, demo:code-mode banner + EOF exit, and the acp handshake.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-09 13:02:19 +08:00
parent bc7da642d4
commit 9fddbac095
12 changed files with 79 additions and 141 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Under `mode: code` (or `both`) the registry turns the tool surface into a progra
- **The dispatch bridge** (`run_code`'s execute): every binding call is JSON-normalized BEFORE dispatch (a value that does not survive — `BigInt`, circulars — rejects that one call, so the dispatched form and the logged form are the same JSON value by construction), serialized through a per-run queue (even `Promise.all` executes the underlying `ctx.tools.execute()` calls one at a time in submission order — the tool contract carries no concurrency-safety metadata yet), gated by `tools/pre-execute`/`tools/post-execute` like any native call (a deny reaches the program as a binding rejection), and logged as one `tool/code-dispatch` session event (log-only: `deriveMessages()` never surfaces it) with the deterministic sub-id `<parent>:code:<n>`. A failed sub-call REJECTS the program-side promise with the tool's error text — real code error handling, no bespoke envelope. A sub-call's `additionalContext` is deliberately DROPPED (no safe outlet mid-run without breaking tool-call/result adjacency; deferred until a real hook needs it through Code Mode).
- **Settlement discipline**: the bridge owns a run-scoped abort that follows the outer signal in and fires when the run settles for any reason, so a budget expiry aborts an in-flight sub-tool instead of orphaning it; the bridge then drains its queue BEFORE returning, so every `tool/code-dispatch` lands inside the open turn. A failed run throws `CodeRunFailedError` (`code: 'CODE_RUN_FAILED'`, message = the failure kind + captured logs), which the pipeline converts to a structured `isError` the model self-corrects from.
The wire collapse is the registry's own contribution (`systemPrompt.tools()` is mode-aware), so the logged `request/header` records it for free — under `code`, the assembled tool list is exactly `[run_code]`, pinned by tests and the snapshot goldens. Try it: `pnpm run demo:code-mode` ([examples/code-agent](../../../examples/code-agent/README.md)); `pnpm run demo:code-mode acp` serves the same mode over ACP instead of the REPL.
The wire collapse is the registry's own contribution (`systemPrompt.tools()` is mode-aware), so the logged `request/header` records it for free — under `code`, the assembled tool list is exactly `[run_code]`, pinned by tests and the snapshot goldens. Try it: `pnpm run demo:code-mode` ([the coding-agent example's Code Mode overlay](../../../examples/coding-agent/README.md#code-mode)); `pnpm run demo:code-mode acp` serves the same mode over ACP instead of the REPL.
### What is NOT here (TODO)