feat(agent-loop): surface max-tokens as a distinct turn-end reason
Add a `max-tokens` variant to `TurnEndReasonMap` and carry the model finish reason up from `runStep` to `runTurn`, applying the rule "any max-tokens step in the turn surfaces as max-tokens" (disposed/aborted/ error still take precedence). This lets consumers distinguish a clean stop from a truncated one — the contract RFC 010's ACP bridge maps to the `max_tokens` stop reason. Also add an AGENTS.md rule: write an ADR when (and only when) a PR makes a durable, contested, surprising decision.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ In the **core** packages (`packages/llm`, `packages/tools`, `packages/agent`, `p
|
||||
|
||||
Verbose documentation is fine **as long as docs and code stay strictly in sync**. Out-of-sync docs are worse than no docs. **When you change code, update its docs in the SAME change** — grep the package README and the module/JSDoc comments for the old behavior (config keys, defaults, error codes, wire field names, event names) and fix every hit. CI runs `yarn doc-sync` (`doc-typecheck` + `verify-event-taxonomy`), which typechecks every fenced `ts` block in `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, and `packages/*/README.md` and verifies the event-taxonomy table against source — but that scope does NOT cover `AGENTS.md`, `packages/AGENTS.md`, or `packages/README.md`, nor does it catch prose drift (config keys, defaults, error codes), so keeping those in sync remains on the author. Every module has a module-level doc comment explaining its role. Every exported class, interface, type, function, and non-obvious method has a JSDoc that explains semantics (not just the name) — contracts (what events fire when), disposal behavior, error behavior, and extension intent. Internal helpers get docs only where non-obvious. Prefer one-liners when one line suffices.
|
||||
|
||||
**Write an ADR when — and only when — a PR makes a decision that is durable, contested, and surprising.** ADRs (`docs/adr/`) record the *why* behind choices a future reader would otherwise re-litigate (the vendoring policy, event-sourcing, the schema DSL are the existing examples). A PR that introduces such a decision — a new third-party runtime dependency over the vendoring default, a cross-package contract, a security/isolation model, a deviation from a documented architecture rule — writes the ADR **in the same PR**, and links it from the relevant code/RFC. A PR whose changes are mechanical, self-evident, or already covered by an existing ADR/RFC needs none — do not manufacture an ADR for a routine change. When unsure, the test is: would a competent maintainer six months from now ask "why was it done this way?" and be unable to answer from the code alone? If yes, write it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Markdown is not hard-wrapped**: write one line per paragraph and let the editor soft-wrap. Hard line breaks mid-paragraph make docs harder to edit and diff — a one-word change reflows and re-diffs the whole paragraph. This applies to prose only: leave fenced code blocks, tables, and list structure intact (a wrapped list item folds to one line per bullet). Code comments / JSDoc are exempt — they stay under the linter's column limit.
|
||||
|
||||
**Editing these instructions**: `AGENTS.md` is the real file; `CLAUDE.md` is a symlink to it (at the repo root and in `packages/`). Always edit `AGENTS.md` — never write through the `CLAUDE.md` symlink or replace it with a regular file.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user