Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Merge branch 'web2-todo' into feat/todo-multi-in-progress

Browse Source 
Stack the parallel-in_progress change on the web todo display (#497): the
GUI is now the surface where several active items are visible, so the two
land as a chain rather than colliding on tool-todo at merge time.

Conflicts combined rather than resolved to one side: tool-todo keeps this
branch's parallel-allowing validation AND web2-todo's additionalProperties
unknown-key rejection, in src/index.ts and both README sides; the spec
drops web2-todo's 'two in_progress' rejection case and keeps its unknown-key
case; the two headless advanced-toolchain session fixtures keep this
branch's parallel transcripts.
This commit is contained in:
Chinesezjc
2026-07-27 14:01:00 +08:00
parent 59d6fdd28e 710a3b1686
commit b2a4341ceb
66 changed files with 1084 additions and 75 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md
+2 -2
View File
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The harness gives the model bash and subagent tools but no way to record a struc
## Decision
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event; the TUI folds it directly, while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event: the TUI folds it directly, the web client projects it into `ConversationSnapshot.todos` ([web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)), while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
### Whole-list replace, three-state status
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
### State on the session log, not a service
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that.
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
### NOT a surface event