docs(tools): name the boundary that rejects a padded integer, and what the flavor-guard test actually reads

pyScalar's docstring attributed the rejection of a String-spelled
beyond-safe-range integer to "the Python runtime". No published backend
makes that call on this base. The fact that does not depend on one: the
padded digits name an integer no double holds, and passing it back would
have to cross the argument boundary as a JSON number. Say that, and say
why String rounds at all -- Number::toString is shortest round-trip, so
2 ** 60 emits the 16 digits that re-read to the same double and pads.
Mirror both in the test comment.

The note's Decision sentence said a test covers the flavor guard through
ctx.tools.schemas(). The test reads the definition's getter directly,
under a language absent from both tables; schemas() reaches the same
getter but has no assertion. Name what is read, and record that a
renderer-without-flavor language is drift this guards against rather
than an existing input -- the two key sets are identical today.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Language selection is a lookup on `ctx.codeRuntime.language`, resolved lazily at
 - `SDK_RENDERERS` (index.ts) maps a language to its `tools:sdk` renderer — `typescript → renderToolsSdk`, `python → renderToolsSdkPy`. The `tools:sdk` section reads the loaded runtime's language and picks the renderer; `requireCodeRuntime` rejects a `mode: code`/`both` runtime whose language is absent from the table, naming the known languages.
 - `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` (code-mode.ts) maps a language to its two model-facing `run_code` strings (tool `description` and the `code` parameter description), so a language's SDK section and its transport schema always agree.
 
-Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first, and a test covers it. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, the doc-catalog schema harvest that never reaches a model) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is two table entries plus its renderer — no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
+Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which the public `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first; the test reads one of those getters off the definition directly, under a language absent from both tables. A language present in `SDK_RENDERERS` but not `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` is the drift this guards against, not an input that exists — the two tables' key sets are identical today. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, the doc-catalog schema harvest that never reaches a model) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is two table entries plus its renderer — no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
 
 `code-mode.ts` depends only on the runtime seam (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`), never on a concrete backend; dispatch is by `runtime.language` at run time. The tool layer therefore lands independently of the protocol and backend PRs — it needs only the seam's `language` field, which is already on master.