feat(ui): make a session that cannot send refuse to accept one

A default naming a route the Models page has since removed left the
composer saying 选择模型 while the input still accepted a message, which
then failed inside the adapter mid-turn.

`session.prompt` now refuses with `model-unavailable` before opening a
turn. That is the enforcement boundary: the method stays callable no
matter what a client disables. `session.models` reports the same fact as
`routable`, and ui-model pushes a block through the new
`ctx.conversation.blocks` registry so the bar renders the disabled
textarea it already renders without a workspace, carrying the blocker's
own reason. The push direction is forced — ui-model already depends on
ui-conversation, so ui-conversation cannot read it back.

The gate is `routable`, not "matches no advertised group": catalog
membership is advisory, so a route serving a model it stopped advertising
is missing from the groups yet perfectly usable, and `null` before the
first load never blocks so a slow Host cannot lock a working composer.

The scaffold gains a route-only adapter for fixture-less keyless
scenarios. Registering zero providers is a test artifact — every product
composition mounts one — and the goldens that froze the seat's fallback
label now show the model those scenarios actually route to.

packages/client/ui-models/README.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A pi-ai profile's `models` list is edited on the card: one row per model showing
 
 **Fetch available models** asks `llm.discoverModels` about the endpoint the form **currently shows**, including a base URL edited but not yet saved and a key typed but not yet stored, so adding a provider is one pass instead of save-then-return. The reply opens a picker rather than being written: candidates already configured start unchecked, so adopting a selection never overwrites a capacity the user corrected. A provider that cannot be interrogated is a detour, not a dead end — the adapter's own message appears beside the rows, which stay editable by hand.
 
-**Add a custom provider** declares a route pi-ai does not ship. It is its own card rather than the editor with extra fields, because the route id is being chosen here and the settings address does not exist until it is: one `settings.mutate` sets the whole profile at `providers.<route>`, and the key travels separately through `credentials.set` under the same `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` derivation an existing provider uses. What a hand-declared route cannot default gates the create button — a unique **Provider ID**, an endpoint, a protocol, and at least one uniquely-identified model — so the failure names the field while the user is still looking at it. Capacities do not gate it: the adapter's fallbacks size a model the endpoint described by id alone, which is what most listings return. The protocol choices are read out of the namespace's own schema rather than a wire field or a constant, so they cannot drift from the ones the adapter accepts. The card records the conventional `apiKeyEnv` reference only when a key is typed, the same rule the editor applies, so a route declared for provider-native authentication is not born pointing at a reference nothing will ever set. The card offers the same provider-level reasoning effort the editor card does for this namespace, from one shared control: both write the same profile field, so a route declared without it would have gained the setting only on being reopened.
+**Add a custom provider** declares a route pi-ai does not ship. It is its own card rather than the editor with extra fields, because the route id is being chosen here and the settings address does not exist until it is: one `settings.mutate` sets the whole profile at `providers.<route>`, and the key travels separately through `credentials.set` under the same `<ROUTE>_API_KEY` derivation an existing provider uses. What a hand-declared route cannot default gates the create button — a unique **Provider ID**, an endpoint, a protocol, and at least one uniquely-identified model — so the failure names the field while the user is still looking at it. Capacities do not gate it: the adapter's fallbacks size a model the endpoint described by id alone, which is what most listings return. The protocol choices are read out of the namespace's own schema rather than a wire field or a constant, so they cannot drift from the ones the adapter accepts. The card records the conventional `apiKeyEnv` reference only when a key is typed, the same rule the editor applies, so a route declared for provider-native authentication is not born pointing at a reference nothing will ever set. When the profile write lands but the key write fails, the provider already exists: the card settles the fields describing it, retries the credential alone — re-running the profile write would carry the revision that write just superseded, so the Host would answer `settings-conflict` and the key could never be stored from here — and reports the created provider even if the user then cancels. The card offers the same provider-level reasoning effort the editor card does for this namespace, from one shared control: both write the same profile field, so a route declared without it would have gained the setting only on being reopened.
 
 ## Model Experience