Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Merge origin/master: adopt the uniform RFC format

Browse Source 
This branch's two RFCs (prompt-variables, provider-lifecycle events)
conform to the new contract in the same merge: 'Status: implemented'
dateless header, 'Rejected alternatives' -> 'Alternatives considered',
'What we give up' folded into '## Consequences' (per the uniform-format
RFC's own rejection of a costs-only closer), and the index regenerated
into the new INDEX.md. docs/rfc/README.md resolved to master's rewrite.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-06 00:13:09 +08:00
parent 6bca9cbeb3 d10d94a640
commit bffdee88e4
125 changed files with 1253 additions and 868 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-subagent-provider-lifecycle-events.md
+7 -10
View File
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# Subagent provider-lifecycle events: `subagent/provider-added` / `subagent/provider-removed`
# RFC: Subagent provider-lifecycle events — `subagent/provider-added` / `subagent/provider-removed`
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-07-05)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
[The prompt-variables RFC](2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md) makes `dsh-tool-subagent` DERIVE its model-facing wording from its provider: `SubagentProvider.inheritsParentContext` (spawn/ACP `false`, fork `true`) drives both the tool description and the `prompt` parameter description (`providerWording`), so the fork tool stops lying about context inheritance. That fix created a cross-fiber data dependency: a tool's description is fixed at TOOL REGISTRATION (deliberately — the description is where tool-choice guidance lives), but the provider arrives on its own plugin fiber, on no particular schedule.
@@ -19,18 +19,15 @@ The registry announces provider membership as typed events, and the consumer mir
The events also complete the seam's vocabulary: `ctx.subagents` is a named registry on which multiple delegation backends coexist (`spawn`, `fork`, `acp`), and a registry whose contents other plugins derive state from should announce membership changes as typed events rather than requiring polling or load-order faith.
## Rejected alternatives
## Alternatives considered
- **Resolving the provider at `apply` time and throwing when absent (a load-order requirement)** — the first implementation, rejected after review reproduced the failure above. Documenting the requirement ("list backends first") would pin a guarantee the Loader does not make.
- **Retrying the lookup (poll until the provider appears)** — converges eventually but invents a private readiness protocol beside the one the framework already has (effect registration + disposal); it also cannot notice a provider LEAVING, so HMR would strand a tool whose wording describes a disposed backend.
- **Section-only subagent wording, lazily resolved at assemble time** — tolerates any load order too, but moves tool-choice guidance out of the DESCRIPTION, contradicting the ownership rule the prompt-variables RFC establishes (per-tool semantics and when-to-use belong in the description). Reactive registration keeps the description authoritative AND order-free.
- **Keying wording off the provider NAME instead of the provider object** — `providerName` is itself config, so a renamed provider silently gets the wrong words; deriving from the resolved provider's own `inheritsParentContext` cannot drift.
## What we give up
- **A window where the tool is absent.** Between backend disposal and re-registration (an HMR reload), the model sees no subagent tool. This is the honest state — the alternative is a tool that dispatches into nothing — and the tool registry's `tools/change` emit keeps prompt assembly current.
- **Two waiting fibers sharing a `toolName` is an invalid config caught late.** If two loads of `dsh-tool-subagent` name different providers but the same `toolName`, both wait, and whichever provider arrives first registers; the second registration throws only when ITS provider arrives. `TODO(subagent-dup-toolname)` in the plugin records this blast radius; the tool registry's duplicate-name rejection remains the backstop.
## Consequences
Consumers deriving state from a named provider react to `subagent/provider-added`/`-removed` instead of reading the registry at `apply` time; `dsh-tool-subagent` is the reference implementation. The [events catalog](../../../cordis-catalog/events.md) carries the exact signatures, and the [producer/consumer map](../../../event-producer-consumer.md) shows `dsh-subagent` emitting and `dsh-tool-subagent` consuming both events.
- Consumers deriving state from a named provider react to `subagent/provider-added`/`-removed` instead of reading the registry at `apply` time; `dsh-tool-subagent` is the reference implementation. The [events catalog](../../../cordis-catalog/events.md) carries the exact signatures, and the [producer/consumer map](../../../event-producer-consumer.md) shows `dsh-subagent` emitting and `dsh-tool-subagent` consuming both events.
- **A window where the tool is absent.** Between backend disposal and re-registration (an HMR reload), the model sees no subagent tool. This is the honest state — the alternative is a tool that dispatches into nothing — and the tool registry's `tools/change` emit keeps prompt assembly current.
- **Two waiting fibers sharing a `toolName` is an invalid config caught late.** If two loads of `dsh-tool-subagent` name different providers but the same `toolName`, both wait, and whichever provider arrives first registers; the second registration throws only when ITS provider arrives. `TODO(subagent-dup-toolname)` in the plugin records this blast radius; the tool registry's duplicate-name rejection remains the backstop.