Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

docs: tighten prose audit after master retarget

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-13 16:24:32 +08:00
parent 17e04a1c70
commit c45d7927cf
192 changed files with 1047 additions and 4078 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ The rule they enforce: **anything the StreamChunk vocabulary cannot express for
## Consequences
Double the adapter maintenance and double the key-gated e2e surface (both adapters cover V4 Flash and Pro across representative thinking/effort modes). Bought: a continuously-verified neutrality guarantee for the most leak-prone abstraction in the codebase, and a worked second example for adapter authors. The two share the core Config shape (`apiKey`/`baseURL`/`models`) so a deployment swaps mostly one line, but the reasoning knob differs — `dsh-llm-deepseek` takes `thinking`/`reasoningEffort`, `dsh-llm-pi-ai` takes a single `reasoning` level — so a swap translates that field. If the maintenance cost ever outweighs the verification value (e.g. once conformance tests from [architectural conformance](../../proposed/process/2026-06-11-architectural-conformance.md) cover the contract mechanically), retiring the twin to a single adapter + the conformance kit would be a new RFC superseding this one.
The twin doubles adapter and key-gated e2e maintenance in exchange for continuous seam-neutrality validation and a second implementation example. Their core config shapes align, although reasoning controls differ. A future conformance suite could justify retiring one adapter through a superseding RFC.