Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

fix(web-todo): dock-owned selection, keyboard-openable row, documented tail todos field

Browse Source 
Three ds-review-bot round-8 findings on the todo display surfaces.

TodoPanel took the whole `useSession` hook and cast the snapshot to reach
`todos`, which put slot plumbing and an unchecked cast inside the presentation
component. The panel now takes `todos: readonly TodoItem[]`; TodoDock does the
selecting, matching the QueueDock posture the dock slot already establishes.

The todo row carried `onClick` with no keyboard route, so its details panel was
mouse-only. It now takes ToolRow's route verbatim: `role="button"`,
`tabIndex={0}`, and an Enter/Space handler that claims the event. The row stays
a `<div>` because a `<button>` flattens its inline spans.

`session.history`'s tail-only `todos` field was documented at the TS signature
but not in the apiproxy README pair, and the Agent Note claimed the feature
added no new wire vocabulary. Both README sides now state the tail/omission
semantics (an omitted field on a tail response is the empty plan, not unchanged
state), and the note records the one added field instead of denying it.

Tests: TodoPanel specs render the plain list; new TodoDock specs cover selection,
live follow, rollback-to-empty, and the registration shape; a new row spec pins
Enter/Space activation and non-activating keys.
This commit is contained in:
Chinesezjc
2026-07-27 12:08:46 +08:00
parent 8ebdad5076
commit d2bb2a809b
9 changed files with 92 additions and 40 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`
## Consequences
Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event with no new wire vocabulary. Cold-load reconstruction is host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.
Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.