docs: reserve seam for complete capabilities
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-package-invariant-runtime-contracts.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The package-owned invariant seam made publication and registration exhaustive, but its first generated baseline accepted empty installers. A follow-up then replaced those empties with generic assertions about plugin names, injections, effects, service methods, and fixed pure-library examples. Those assertions made every companion executable without making the system safer: TypeScript, Cordis startup, package tests, and module-load tests already enforce those shapes, while the invariant service should detect impossible runtime state.
|
||||
The package-owned invariant service made publication and registration exhaustive, but its first generated baseline accepted empty installers. A follow-up then replaced those empties with generic assertions about plugin names, injections, effects, service methods, and fixed pure-library examples. Those assertions made every companion executable without making the system safer: TypeScript, Cordis startup, package tests, and module-load tests already enforce those shapes, while the invariant service should detect impossible runtime state.
|
||||
|
||||
A useful runtime invariant relates observations over time or across a mutable data structure. Examples include a terminal event without its start, an LLM delta for a block that is not open, or a durable result whose identity differs from its request. Merely confirming that a declared method exists, that a plugin has its expected name, or that a constant example still returns a known value is not such a relation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user