Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Browse Source 
Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-05 22:58:25 +08:00
parent d5cb3297ad
commit e6fad266a6
123 changed files with 1221 additions and 847 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-custom-schema-dsl.md
+5 -5
View File
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Custom typed tool-schema DSL instead of schemastery
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-11)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
Tool parameters must reach the model as standard JSON Schema (the wire format), and tool authors deserve typed `execute(args)` without casts. The repo already vendors schemastery (used for plugin Config), so reusing it was the obvious candidate. The user also explicitly preferred per-property `required: true` booleans over JSON Schema's separate `required` array.
@@ -12,7 +10,9 @@ Tool parameters must reach the model as standard JSON Schema (the wire format),
A small custom DSL in dsh-tools: `SchemaSpec` (per-property specs with `required: true` booleans), type-level `InferArgs<S>` mapping a spec to the argument type (required keys non-optional, others genuinely optional via `?`), a runtime `schemaSpecToJsonSchema()` converter, and `defineTool()` tying them together. Raw JSON-Schema `ToolDefinition`s remain accepted by `ToolRegistry.register()` — that's how MCP-sourced tools arrive.
Schemastery was evaluated and rejected for this use: it targets validation / transformation against StandardSchema, not JSON Schema *generation*, so it would add indirection without producing the wire format cleanly.
## Alternatives considered
**Schemastery** (already vendored, used for plugin Config) was evaluated and rejected for this use: it targets validation / transformation against StandardSchema, not JSON Schema *generation*, so it would add indirection without producing the wire format cleanly.
## Consequences