docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.

docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md

@@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ Wire mapping (`attributionHeaders`; header names lowercase in code - HTTP field
 
 Endpoint detection is not part of this RFC because no endpoint-specific mapping is accepted here. If OpenRouter support lands later, detection must be explicit: either a dedicated OpenRouter provider package or an explicit `provider: 'openrouter'` / `attributionTarget: 'openrouter'` config, not arbitrary path fragments or model names.
 
-## Acceptance criteria (all landed)
+## Verification
+
+The landed contract:
 
 - `dsh-llm` documents the mandatory `User-Agent` attribution contract for `LlmAdapter` authors (`LlmAdapter` JSDoc, package README, and the adapter-contract section of `docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md`).
 - A shared helper (`attributionHeaders` / `userAgent`) constructs the app identity and the standard `User-Agent` value from package metadata, so adapters do not hand-copy version constants.
@@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ Endpoint detection is not part of this RFC because no endpoint-specific mapping
 
 **Product-named token (`deepseek-harness-sdk`).** Considered for the `User-Agent` token, since the product name is DeepSeek Harness SDK. `deepseek-harness` won on continuity: it is the identity providers already see from this codebase, it matches the org/repo identity and package scope, and it keeps wire attribution stable while display copy carries the product name.
 
-## Risks / what we give up
+## Consequences
 
 **Providers see that traffic comes from the harness.** That is the point, but it means deployments that previously blended into generic SDK traffic become identifiable. Mitigation: send only static public product data and let forks/white-label deployments pass their own `AppIdentity`.