docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-05 22:58:25 +08:00
parent d5cb3297ad
commit e6fad266a6
123 changed files with 1221 additions and 847 deletions
@@ -152,21 +152,17 @@ Both mutations are still atomic (the backend's per-target lock is unconditional)
This amends — does not reverse — [the split-fs-seam RFC](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md). The four-layer split, the provider contract, and the freshness *policy* are all kept. What changes is the **coupling between the tool and the policy layer**: a mandatory method service became a plugin-owned event gate, and the fs I/O + read windowing moved from `fileContext` up into `dsh-tool-fs`. The split-fs-seam RFC's description of `dsh-tool-fs` injecting `fileContext` and of `fileContext` owning `read`/`write`/`edit` was updated to match in the same change.
## Acceptance Criteria
## Verification
- The `dsh-tool-fs` root plugin injects `fs` (+ `tools`/`systemPrompt`), not `fileContext`; it calls `ctx.fs` directly and dispatches the `fs/write-intent`/`fs/edit-intent` waterfalls (passing `exec` as the actor) and the `fs/observed` emit. Read rendering lives in `dsh-tool-fs`. (No subpath plugins — see the Tool contract above.)
- `dsh-fs` declares the three events with `@mode` tags and an opaque `object` actor argument (no agent/session structure leaks into the provider vocabulary); the generated cordis catalog is regenerated.
- `dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin, not a service: it does not register `ctx.fileContext`, has no public `read`/`write`/`edit`/`resolve` methods, and does not inject `fs`; it registers the three listeners, keeps observed-state, and has HMR/disposal coverage (dispose the fiber, assert the gate no longer rewrites).
- **Bare-provider test**: a config WITHOUT `dsh-fs-policy` boots the `dsh-tool-fs` root plugin, and `read`/`write`(create AND overwrite)/`edit` work against the real `dsh-fs-local`; an `edit` of an unread existing file and an overwrite of an existing unread file both succeed (unconditional bare-provider behavior), proving the tool carries no `fileContext` dependency. A bare-provider edit of a missing target reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`. With `dsh-fs-policy` present, the same unread `edit` is rejected `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` and the same unread overwrite uses `createIfAbsent` (rejected on an existing file).
- **Single-slot semantics**: a test registers a second `fs/edit-intent` listener AFTER `dsh-fs-policy` and asserts it is NOT reached (first-wins short-circuit), and documents in a comment that a decider registered before/`prepend`ed would instead win — the slot is first-wins by convention, not an enforced invariant.
- **Fire-and-forget recording**: `fs/observed` is emitted via a plain `ctx.emit` after the mutation succeeds; a listener is contractually synchronous and side-effect-only, so the tool does not guard it.
- `dsh-fs` `writeText`/`editText` make `expected` optional (omit ⇒ unconditional); the `FsWriteIntent` union is unchanged, and `dsh-fs-policy`'s guarded paths (`createIfAbsent`/`replaceIfVersion`/`{ version }`) behave exactly as today. A bare-provider test exercises an unconditional overwrite, an unconditional edit, and a missing-target edit reporting `FS_STALE_VERSION`.
- Freshness is enforced by provider CAS when guarded: an edit after a stale read reports `FS_STALE_VERSION` (regression test); `dsh-fs-policy` performs no `stat`.
- `stat` budget: read = 1, write = 0, edit = 0 — in the tool, with or without `dsh-fs-policy` (the bare default returns `undefined`, never stats). A test asserts neither write nor edit stats in the tool on either path.
- Model-facing schemas stay byte-for-byte unchanged; snapshot transcript goldens are unaffected (or the diff is reviewed and re-recorded with justification).
- Docs/artifacts updated in the same change: `docs/architecture.md`, fs package READMEs, `docs/core-data-structures/filesystem.md`, the split-fs-seam RFC's now-amended description, type-equiv blocks + manifest, cordis catalog, module graph. Gates green: `doc-sync`, `knip`, `test:coverage` (100% per-file).
The decoupling and its semantics are pinned by tests: a bare-provider config (no `dsh-fs-policy`) boots the `dsh-tool-fs` root plugin and `read`/`write` (create and overwrite)/`edit` work against the real `dsh-fs-local` — an unread edit and an unread overwrite both succeed, proving the tool carries no `fileContext` dependency, while the same operations with `dsh-fs-policy` present are rejected `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` / gated `createIfAbsent`. A second `fs/edit-intent` listener registered after `dsh-fs-policy` is asserted NOT reached (first-wins short-circuit). A stale-read edit reports `FS_STALE_VERSION` through provider CAS, with `dsh-fs-policy` performing no `stat`; the tool's `stat` budget (read = 1, write = 0, edit = 0, on both paths) is asserted directly. Model-facing schemas stayed byte-for-byte unchanged, so snapshot transcript goldens are unaffected.
## Risks
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep `ctx.fileContext` as an in-path method service** — the shape [the split-fs-seam RFC](../simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md) first landed; rejected because the tool could not run without the policy layer, making policy load-bearing for basic operation instead of an opt-in tightening.
- **Policy-side version checking** (`dsh-fs-policy` stats and compares in its waterfall handler) — rejected for the TOCTOU gap between that check and the tool's actual write; the provider's mutation critical section is the only race-free place, so the policy only chooses the CAS basis and gates on prior observation.
- **Per-tool `/read`/`/write`/`/edit` subpath plugins** — dropped on implementation: no consumer needed a single-tool deployment, and subpath publishing forced bespoke `tsdown`/`tsconfig`/`files`/workspace-constraint handling no sibling tool package carries; the per-tool registration helpers remain internal modules the root plugin composes.
## Consequences
- **Event indirection over a method call.** A waterfall + emit is less direct than `await ctx.fileContext.edit(...)`. The payoff is removing the tool-to-policy method dependency while keeping the default policy plugin; the cost is one more event vocabulary to learn. Mitigated by keeping the three events narrow and documenting the default-thunk semantics on each.
- **Policy events in the storage seam.** `dsh-fs` gains two version-decision events plus a recording event though it is "just storage". This is the price of decoupling (the emitter cannot depend on the policy plugin). The events carry only `dsh-fs` vocabulary plus an opaque `object` actor and no model-facing concepts, so the seam stays free of line-window/observation policy types and of the agent/session owner structure.