docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-05 22:58:25 +08:00
parent d5cb3297ad
commit e6fad266a6
123 changed files with 1221 additions and 847 deletions
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Doc-sync enforcement
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-14)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
AGENTS.md promises that docs and code stay strictly in sync, but the promise was verified by eyeball. Review caught drift twice — a cookbook example contradicting the type policy, and a README citing the wrong `registerAdapter` call. Out-of-sync docs are worse than no docs, and this codebase is built primarily by agents that follow gates far more reliably than prose (mechanical quality gates). Two classes of doc drift are mechanically checkable: code blocks that no longer compile, and the event-taxonomy table that duplicates the `interface Events` declarations.
@@ -15,13 +13,18 @@ Two gates, mirroring the existing `scripts/` style (tsx ESM, one job each):
1. **`doc-typecheck`** extracts every fenced ` ```ts ` block from `README.md`, `docs/**`, and `packages/*/README.md`, writes them to a temp project extending the root `tsconfig.json`, and compiles it with `tsc -b`. The temp project reuses the source `paths` map and the root project references, so documentation examples see source while vendored code remains checked under its own tsconfig settings. A block that is a deliberate sketch opts out with an explicit ` ```ts ignore-check ` info string; the script reports the opt-out ratio and fails if it exceeds half, so the escape hatch can't quietly become the norm.
2. **`verify-event-taxonomy`** extracts the event names from the `interface Events` blocks across `packages/*/src` and from the taxonomy table in `docs/architecture.md`, and asserts the two sets match exactly. Verify, don't generate: the table keeps its hand-written Mode/Purpose columns; only the set of names is checked. (Landing this surfaced three events the table had been missing — `tools/change`, `llm/adapter-change`, `system-prompt/change`.) **Superseded** by [the generated cordis catalog](2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md): this gate and its `architecture.md` table are retired in favor of the fully-generated `docs/cordis-catalog/events.md` + `docs/cordis-catalog/services.md` and their `verify-cordis-catalog` freshness gate. The other gates here (`doc-typecheck`, and the `verify-md-wrap` amendment below) are unaffected.
Both run via a shared `doc-sync` package.json script that the lefthook pre-push hook and CI both invoke ([mechanical quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md): hooks and CI call the same scripts, so the gate fires locally before a push — not only after it). They run after `pnpm run typecheck`, which validates the package/vendor build graph that doc-typecheck references. API-extractor golden reports ([the deferred API-extractor-reports proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-06-11-api-extractor-reports.md)) were deliberately **deferred** — low value for an internal monorepo where reviewers already see the source diff, and a heavy, finicky dependency.
Both run via a shared `doc-sync` package.json script that the lefthook pre-push hook and CI both invoke ([mechanical quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md): hooks and CI call the same scripts, so the gate fires locally before a push — not only after it). They run after `pnpm run typecheck`, which validates the package/vendor build graph that doc-typecheck references.
**Amendment (2026-06-17):** a third gate, **`verify-md-wrap`**, was later folded into `doc-sync`. It parses each in-scope Markdown file (`README.md`, `docs/**`, `packages/*/README.md`, plus `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md`) with `mdast-util-from-markdown` + GFM and fails on any `paragraph` node spanning more than one source line, enforcing the docs/AGENTS.md "one physical line per paragraph" writing rule. Same verify-don't-generate principle: it reports hard-wraps and never rewrites, so it adds no formatting churn. `doc-sync` is now three gates.
## Alternatives considered
- **API-extractor golden reports** ([the deferred proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-06-11-api-extractor-reports.md)) — deliberately deferred: low value for an internal monorepo where reviewers already see the source diff, and a heavy, finicky dependency.
- **Generating the taxonomy table from source** instead of verifying names — rejected as more machinery than the problem warranted; the table kept its hand-written Mode/Purpose columns until [the generated cordis catalog](2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md) superseded the check entirely.
## Consequences
- Doc drift in the checkable classes now fails the pre-push hook and CI instead of waiting for a reviewer to notice. This is an instance of the "mechanical gates over prose" principle.
- Making doc snippets compile costs a few stub imports/`declare`s; the `ignore-check` ratio must stay low or the gate is theater (the ratio guard enforces this).
- The taxonomy check is name-only — a wrong Mode or Purpose column still needs human review. Generating the table from source was considered and rejected as more machinery than the problem warrants.
- The taxonomy check is name-only — a wrong Mode or Purpose column still needs human review.
- API reports remain available to revisit if the packages are ever published externally.
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Mechanical quality gates over prose guidelines
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-11)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
This codebase is developed primarily by coding agents. Agents follow enforced gates far more reliably than prose conventions, and "a lot of work" is not a cost argument when agents do the labor. Early evidence: tests that didn't typecheck shipped (vitest doesn't typecheck) and were only caught by a review.
@@ -23,3 +21,5 @@ Every AGENTS.md promise gets a command that exits non-zero, wired into git hooks
- Conventions survive agent turnover; violations fail fast and locally.
- The gates themselves are code to maintain; config changes are reviewed like any change.
- 100%-coverage pressure can produce assertion-free tests — mutation testing is the planned counterweight (see [the mutation-testing proposal](../../proposed/testing/2026-06-11-mutation-testing.md)).
<!-- rfc-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format RFC) -->
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: tsdown for JS bundling instead of dumble
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-11)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
The initial build used **dumble**, the cordiverse zero-config esbuild wrapper that upstream Cordis itself builds with — maximum alignment with the vendored packages' conventions (it reads each package.json and infers entries/formats from the `exports` field). But dumble is a liability as a load-bearing tool in this repo: v0.2.x, ~530 npm downloads/week, effectively one maintainer, and we were invoking it through a custom orchestration script (`scripts/build.ts`) because it has no workspace mode.
@@ -19,7 +17,11 @@ Replace dumble with **tsdown** (rolldown-based, ~2.5M downloads/week, VoidZero-b
- Two per-package overrides in vendor/ (ours, like the regenerated tsconfigs; logged in vendor/README.md): schemastery (dual `.mjs`/`.cjs` via `outExtensions`), logger-console (two single-entry passes so the shared base class is inlined into each entry instead of a hash-named chunk, matching upstream's published shape).
- `scripts/build.ts` deleted; `pnpm run build` = `tsc -b tsconfig.build.json && tsdown`.
Alternatives considered: **direct esbuild script** (most established engine, zero wrapper risk, but hand-maintains the per-package spec table tsdown's workspace mode gives us); **pkgroll** (closest drop-in philosophically, but 78k dl/wk and Rollup-based — strictly weaker maintenance story than tsdown); **keep dumble** (perfect upstream alignment, unacceptable bus factor).
## Alternatives considered
- **A direct esbuild script** — the most established engine and zero wrapper risk, but hand-maintains the per-package spec table tsdown's workspace mode gives us.
- **pkgroll** — the closest drop-in philosophically, but 78k downloads/week and Rollup-based: strictly weaker maintenance story than tsdown.
- **Keep dumble** — perfect upstream alignment, unacceptable bus factor.
## Consequences
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Vendor Cordis as source, not npm dependencies
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-11)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
DeepSeek Harness SDK is built on the Cordis framework. Cordis core was at 4.0.0-rc.6 (a release candidate) when this repo started; the harness depends on framework internals (fiber lifecycle, effect disposal, waterfall dispatch) whose exact behavior matters to the agent loop's correctness guarantees.
@@ -14,6 +12,11 @@ Copy the needed Cordis packages (core, loader, include, group, timer, hmr, logge
`vendor/README.md` is the manifest: upstream repo + commit SHA per package and an exhaustive local-modification log. A pre-commit guard (`scripts/check-vendor-manifest.sh`) rejects vendored-source changes that don't update the manifest in the same commit.
## Alternatives considered
- **Depend on the npm packages** — rejected: core was at a release candidate, and the harness leans on framework internals (fiber lifecycle, effect disposal, waterfall dispatch) whose exact behavior the agent loop's correctness guarantees depend on; an upstream RC bump could break them without a local fix path.
- **Vendor everything transitively** — rejected: truly third-party dependencies (js-yaml, chokidar, @standard-schema/spec, …) stay on npm; only the framework layer whose internals matter is owned.
## Consequences
- The harness fully owns its framework layer: auditable, patchable, pinned — an RC upstream can't break us, and we can fix framework bugs in-tree.
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: pnpm as the package manager instead of Yarn 4
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-16)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
The repo shipped on **Yarn 4** with the `node-modules` linker — a deliberately conservative choice that behaves like npm's flat layout while giving us Yarn's workspaces and `yarn constraints`. It worked. But Yarn 4's Plug'n'Play heritage makes the `node-modules` linker the off-the-beaten-path mode, and the broader JS ecosystem — tooling defaults, CI actions, Corepack examples, contributor familiarity — increasingly centers on pnpm. For a repo that is built primarily by agents and read by occasional human contributors, "the package manager most tools and people expect" has real value: fewer surprises, better-trodden failure paths, more copy-pasteable answers.
@@ -20,7 +18,11 @@ Adopt **pnpm 11.7.0**, pinned via the `packageManager` field and installed throu
- **Constraints become package-manager-independent.** `yarn.config.cjs` (which imported `@yarnpkg/types` and used `Yarn.workspaces()` / `workspace.set()`) is replaced by `scripts/check-workspace-constraints.ts`, a plain tsx script run as `pnpm run constraints`. It enforces the identical invariants — every package `private: true`; `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` packages declare `cordis` as both a peer- and dev-dependency with matching ranges, `version: 0.0.1`, `type: module`; vendored packages checked for privacy only — over the same `vendor` + `packages` scope.
- All `yarn …` verbs across CI, lefthook hooks, `package.json` scripts, and docs become `pnpm …` / `pnpm run …`. `yarn.lock` → `pnpm-lock.yaml` (lockfile v9). `.gitignore` swaps `.yarn/` for `.pnpm-store/`. Vendored READMEs (e.g. `vendor/cordis/README.md`) keep their upstream `yarn` examples untouched per the Vendoring Policy.
Alternatives considered: **keep Yarn 4** (zero churn, but bets on the less-traveled linker mode and a constraints engine tied to one package manager); **npm workspaces** (ubiquitous, but no constraints story and weaker monorepo ergonomics); **pnpm with hoisted linker** (smoother migration, but throws away the phantom-dependency safety that is the main correctness reason to move).
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep Yarn 4** — zero churn, but bets on the less-traveled linker mode and a constraints engine tied to one package manager.
- **npm workspaces** — ubiquitous, but no constraints story and weaker monorepo ergonomics.
- **pnpm with the hoisted linker** — smoother migration, but throws away the phantom-dependency safety that is the main correctness reason to move.
## Consequences
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: TSC-first build and one tsconfig
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-20)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
The current TypeScript build and typecheck setup had these issues:
@@ -57,6 +55,11 @@ tsc -b tsconfig.json
`pnpm run demo:*` still runs `src` directly through tsx and root paths, without a compile step.
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep `tsdown`/oxc as the TypeScript transformer** — oxc's transform is not `tsc` behavior (decorator transform differs, bundled JS differs from per-file emit), and its bundled `.d.ts` conflicts with Cordis' internal relative module augmentation shape.
- **One root strict program over packages, vendor, examples, tests, and scripts** — vendor source triggers type errors outside this project's ownership under the root strict flags; project references with per-project strictness are the boundary that works.
## Consequences
Build responsibilities are clearer:
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Markdown cross-link validity linting
Status: implemented (proposed 2026-06-18, accepted 2026-06-18)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
Docs in this repo link to each other by relative path — `[topic](../implemented/2026-…-….md)`, `[the cookbook](adding-a-tool.md)`, `[architecture.md](../../architecture.md)`. Nothing verified those targets exist. A rename or a move silently breaks every inbound link, and the break is invisible until a reader clicks it. [Doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md) already mechanized two classes of doc drift (uncompilable code blocks, a stale event-taxonomy table) and [verify-md-wrap](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md) a third (hard-wrapped prose) — but a dead cross-link is a fourth, equally mechanical class that was still verified by eyeball.
@@ -18,11 +18,14 @@ A fourth `doc-sync` gate, `verify-md-links` (`scripts/verify-md-links.ts`), mirr
Scope matches the other gates plus the AGENTS.md pair and the repo-authored agent-skill Markdown under `.agents/skills/` (those skill files cross-link into the docs tree, so this reorg rewrote links in them too): `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, `packages/*/README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `packages/AGENTS.md`, `.agents/skills/**/*.md`, deduped by real path (the `CLAUDE.md` symlinks resolve onto the AGENTS.md files). It is wired into the `doc-sync` script that the lefthook pre-push hook and CI both run, so a broken link fails locally before a push — consistent with [mechanical quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md).
This gate checks *existence*, not anchor validity: a link to a real file with a `#wrong-heading` fragment still passes (the file resolves; the fragment is stripped). Anchor-level checking is a heavier, lower-value follow-up — file-level dead links are the failure that actually bit us.
This gate checks *existence*, not anchor validity: a link to a real file with a `#wrong-heading` fragment still passes (the file resolves; the fragment is stripped).
## Alternatives considered
**Anchor-level validity checking** — heavier and lower-value; file-level dead links are the failure that actually bit. The scope cut is deliberate: authors verify `#fragment` anchors themselves when linking to one.
## Consequences
- Renames and moves that orphan a cross-link now fail the pre-push hook and CI instead of waiting for a reader to click a dead link. This made the RFC reorganization that introduced the gate self-verifying: the same PR that rewrote forty links also added the check that proves none dangle.
- One more fast tsx script in the `doc-sync` chain; no new dependency (the mdast/GFM stack is already in devDependencies for `verify-md-wrap`).
- Fragment/anchor validity remains unchecked — a known, deliberate scope cut.
- The convention this enforces — cross-reference docs by machine-checkable relative link, never by bare prose or a number — is documented in [docs/AGENTS.md](../../../AGENTS.md) so authors know the gate exists and why.
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Core-data-structures catalog and the `ts type-equiv` drift gate
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-20)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
A reader trying to understand the harness could find its *behavior* in [architecture.md](../../../architecture.md) (the service map, the session/turn/step lifecycle, the event taxonomy) but had no single place describing its *vocabulary* — the data structures that behavior moves around. The type shapes lived only in source, scattered across `packages/*/src/types.ts`, so understanding "what is a `Message`, a `SessionEvent`, a `StreamChunk`" meant reading the declarations directly. A prose catalog would help, but a catalog that paraphrases or paste-copies type definitions rots the instant a field changes — and an out-of-sync type doc is worse than none, because a reader trusts it.
@@ -40,6 +38,12 @@ The durability requirement was specific: the doc should show the **literal** cur
`verify-type-equiv` catches a *drifted paste* of an already-documented type, but it cannot tell you a brand-new core type went undocumented. So AGENTS.md and the `dsh-code-review` skill were updated to require keeping the catalog in sync when a change adds or reshapes a documented type — the gate handles drift, the human handles new surface.
## Alternatives considered
- **A flat dump of all cross-package vocabulary** — the `BashExecRequest` test case killed it: if seam vocabulary is "core", the catalog helps no one; the tiered spine-vs-seam structure won.
- **A compiled `_Check` assignability assertion** instead of the verbatim source match — rejected because byte-equality, not assignability, is the property we want: a renamed field with the same type would pass assignability.
- **Provenance as directive comments in the prose** — rejected for the central manifest, whose enforced 1:1 correspondence means a block can never be silently unchecked and an entry can never rot.
## Process
The design was driven entirely by a one-question-at-a-time grilling that walked the scoping decision tree through concrete examples (`BashExecRequest`, `ToolSchema`, `ToolDefinition`, the schema DSL, the presentation types, the session/persistence split) before committing to the spine-vs-seam rule — the rule was the *output* of the examples, not an a-priori axiom. The implementation landed as four commits mirroring the structure of the work: the gate (`e97f94b`), the catalog (`7e33c7b`), the maintenance-guard updates (`53e01a0`), and a review-fix commit (`6da7a0f`).
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Generated cordis events + services catalog
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-20)
Status: implemented
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
## Context
## Problem
A plugin author needs two reference surfaces that no single document gave them: every cordis **event** they can listen to (with its exact signature and dispatch mode) and every `ctx.<key>` **service** they can call (with its exact interface). The pieces existed but were scattered — a hand-maintained event-taxonomy *table* in `docs/architecture.md` (names + prose Mode/Purpose, name-set-checked by `verify-event-taxonomy`), a Service-map table (8 rows of role prose), and the `interface Events` / `interface Context` declarations themselves. The taxonomy table also could not catch a brand-new *undocumented* event: a name-set verifier only checks the names that are already in the table on both sides.
@@ -25,7 +23,13 @@ Specific choices:
- **Cross-links to the data-structure catalog.** A type name in a signature (`GenerateOptions`, `StreamChunk`, `ToolDefinition`, …) links to the core-data-structures page that documents it. The map is a small hand-curated const in the generator — NOT `type-equiv.manifest.json`, which documents the `…Map` symbols while signatures reference the derived union names, and lists a few symbols on two pages.
- **A dedicated fence.** Signature blocks use a ` ```ts cordis-catalog ` info string that `doc-typecheck` recognizes and skips (a bare signature fragment is not standalone-compilable), excluded from the opt-out ratio — the same treatment `type-equiv` blocks get.
This **supersedes the event-taxonomy half** of [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md): `verify-event-taxonomy` and its `docs/architecture.md` table are retired (the architecture.md heading stays, its body now points at the catalog; the Service-map role table stays as curated prose). The verify-don't-generate principle that RFC chose for the taxonomy is reversed *for this surface only* — the data here is mechanically complete, so generation is strictly stronger (full signatures, cannot drift, catches undocumented events) than a name-set check of a hand-table. doc-typecheck, verify-md-wrap, verify-md-links, and verify-type-equiv are unchanged.
This **supersedes the event-taxonomy half** of [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md): `verify-event-taxonomy` and its `docs/architecture.md` table are retired (the architecture.md heading stays, its body now points at the catalog; the Service-map role table stays as curated prose). doc-typecheck, verify-md-wrap, verify-md-links, and verify-type-equiv are unchanged.
## Alternatives considered
- **Verify-don't-generate, as the retired taxonomy check did** — reversed *for this surface only*: the data here is mechanically complete, so generation is strictly stronger (full signatures, cannot drift, catches undocumented events) than a name-set check of a hand-maintained table.
- **Walking the vendor AST for the inherited tier** — rejected for the curated table: the cordis-core `Context` mixes true ctx members with non-service fields, and the pinned vendor surface changes only on a deliberate sync.
- **Reusing `type-equiv.manifest.json` as the signature cross-link map** — rejected for a small hand-curated const: the manifest documents the `…Map` symbols while signatures reference the derived union names, and it lists a few symbols on two pages.
## Consequences
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Classify RFCs by kind via path-encoded subdirectories
Status: implemented (proposed 2026-06-20, accepted 2026-06-20)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
`docs/rfc/` grouped RFCs by **lifecycle** only — `proposed/` / `implemented/` / `rejected/`. Nothing recorded what *kind* of decision each RFC was. The index was one flat list per lifecycle, with no way to scan "show me every simplification" or "every testing-strategy decision." A wave of simplification RFCs landing on the same day made the gap concrete: a reader skimming `proposed/` could not tell a new capability from a removal from a tooling-policy change without opening each file.
@@ -29,14 +29,14 @@ The `architecture` / `process` line: **architecture** is about the source we shi
Both are `doc-sync` members, in the `verify-md-wrap` style (tsx ESM, verify-don't-generate, exit non-zero on the first violation):
- **`scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts`** — the closed set and index freshness. It asserts every file under a lifecycle folder lives in a class folder from the canonical set (a loose `.md` at a lifecycle root, or an unknown class folder, fails), and that the README's marker-delimited index regions byte-match a fresh render from the tree (see [generate the RFC index tables](2026-07-04-generate-rfc-index-tables.md)). The canonical class set lives as a `const` in `scripts/rfc-index.ts` — the machine source of truth shared with the generator — and [the index](../../README.md) documents it in prose; the README's class *descriptions* stay hand-written, its tables are generated.
- **`scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts`** — the closed set and index freshness. It asserts every file under a lifecycle folder lives in a class folder from the canonical set (a loose `.md` at a lifecycle root, or an unknown class folder, fails), and that the generated [INDEX.md](../../INDEX.md) byte-matches a fresh render from the tree (see [generate the RFC index tables](2026-07-04-generate-rfc-index-tables.md)). The canonical class set lives as a `const` in `scripts/rfc-index.ts` — the machine source of truth shared with the generator — and [the README](../../README.md) documents it in prose; the class *descriptions* stay hand-written, the index is generated.
- **`scripts/verify-doc-refs.ts`** — source comments that cite docs. RFC paths are referenced not only from Markdown but from TypeScript doc comments (root-relative prose like `docs/rfc/implemented/testing/2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.md`). `verify-md-links` never saw those, so the reorg could have silently orphaned them. This gate scans repo-authored `.ts` under `packages/**` and `examples/**` (excluding built `lib/` and `vendor/`) for `docs/….md` tokens, resolves each root-relative, and asserts it exists. It requires the `.md` extension so extensionless prose (`docs/postmortem/0001`, `docs/architecture.md § Extending The Harness`) is left alone.
### Rejected alternatives
## Alternatives considered
- **A `Classification:` prose line** in each file (next to `Status:`), parsed by the gate. Workable, but it duplicates into the file a fact the path can already carry, and a line can disagree with its folder. Path-encoding makes the label and its storage the same thing — there is nothing to keep in sync.
- **A `refactor` class.** It overlaps `simplification` almost entirely; the only discriminator anyone reached for was "does observable behavior change?", which `simplification` already encodes (it does not). One class, not two.
- **Auto-generating the README index** from the filesystem. Rejected here to keep the index hand-written; superseded by [generate the RFC index tables](2026-07-04-generate-rfc-index-tables.md) once stacked proposal waves made the hand-written tables the repo's most conflict-prone docs region — the tables are now generated between markers while the surrounding prose stays curated.
- **Auto-generating the index** from the filesystem. Rejected here to keep the index hand-written; superseded by [generate the RFC index tables](2026-07-04-generate-rfc-index-tables.md) once stacked proposal waves made the hand-written tables the repo's most conflict-prone docs region — the list is now the fully generated [INDEX.md](../../INDEX.md) while the README prose stays curated.
## Consequences
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 517a6371eca5d747313c7efdb2756a50257701e4
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: f8f68bf5d4d7e6795318d9dd435a525f20a4f407
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 8731fef46b16cfa20d223575c70774cff780a6aa
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: ce2589498ab16cf5ca2f5cdb3f58d031aeb8298f
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
# Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate
# RFC: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)
## Context
## Problem
This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
# 通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档
# RFC: 通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文
## 背景
## 问题
本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent(智能体)以中英两种语言阅读。没有机制、纯靠手工维护第二语言,正是译文腐烂的方式:一侧继续演进,另一侧默默地说谎,而没有门禁会注意到。对这类不变式,本仓库一贯的答案是把它编码成机械检查(见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)),因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Generated tool-schema catalog (boot-and-harvest)
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-07-02)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
A reader — a plugin author, a prompt engineer, someone auditing what the agent can do — has no single place that lists the model-facing tools the harness ships. The `name` / `description` / JSON-Schema `parameters` a tool contributes are what the model actually receives (via `ctx.systemPrompt.tools()` off `ctx.tools.schemas()`), but they are scattered across each `defineTool` call in each `packages/*/tool-*` package, buried in string concatenation and runtime spreads. The cordis [events](../../../cordis-catalog/events.md) & [services](../../../cordis-catalog/services.md) catalogs ([their RFC](2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md)) document the *wiring* a plugin works against and the [core-data-structures catalog](../../../core-data-structures/core.md) documents the *vocabulary* those signatures move — but neither documents the *tools* the agent is offered. This RFC adds that third reference surface, `docs/tool-catalog/tools.md`, and a freshness gate so it cannot drift.
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ The unit is the PACKAGE, not the deployed tool instance. A package's registered
Schema blocks use ` ```json `, not a bespoke `ts`-family fence. `doc-typecheck` only extracts `ts*` fences, so a JSON block is invisible to it — no `BlockKind` wiring is needed (unlike the cordis catalog's `ts cordis-catalog` fence, which had to be allowlisted so a bare signature fragment isn't compiled).
## Alternatives considered
- **A pure TypeScript-AST pass, like the cordis catalog** — tool schemas are not statically knowable (the crux above): runtime spreads, string concatenation, config-chosen names, and raw `ctx.tools.register()` registrations all make an AST-derived doc lie.
- **Inferring each package's boot recipe from its injects** — the "too clever" path [the discover-package-inventory proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-06-20-discover-package-inventory.md) warns against; the recipe stays hand-written policy while the inventory is discovered and completeness-guarded.
- **A bespoke `ts`-family fence for schema blocks** — unnecessary: a plain ` ```json ` fence is invisible to `doc-typecheck`, so no `BlockKind` allowlisting is needed.
## Consequences
- The catalog cannot drift: a tool schema change the committed file doesn't reflect fails `verify-tool-catalog` in the pre-push hook and CI. A new `tool-*` package not added to the manifest fails the completeness guard outright.
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
# RFC: Documentation graph index for maintainers and SDK users
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-07-03)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
The repo already had several high-trust documentation surfaces, each on a different axis: [module-graph.md](../../../module-graph.md) is generated from package `peerDependencies`, the generated [Cordis events](../../../cordis-catalog/events.md) and [services](../../../cordis-catalog/services.md) catalogs are generated from Cordis `Events` and `Context` declarations, [tool-catalog/tools.md](../../../tool-catalog/tools.md) is generated by booting shipped tool plugins, and [core-data-structures/](../../../core-data-structures/core.md) uses `ts type-equiv` blocks to keep pasted type definitions synchronized with source.
Those references are accurate, but they are mostly catalogs. A maintainer still has to synthesize the relationships: which packages form a capability seam, which app bundles a concrete spine, which event is durable vs live, where a hook or policy plugin can intercept work, and which model-facing tool depends on which service. An SDK user has the same problem from another angle: "Which package do I install or load for the behavior I want, and which event/service/tool do I extend?"
The pressure is already visible in the open stacks even though this implementation is based on `origin/master`: the hooks stack through PR #129 makes event producer/consumer topology and interception points much more important, while the filesystem stack through PR #128 makes capability seams, policy vetoes, tool presentation, and SDK assembly paths much more important. Graphs based only on today's small bash/todo/subagent surface would become obsolete as soon as those stacks land.
The hooks subsystem makes event producer/consumer topology and interception points much more important, and the filesystem seam makes capability seams, policy vetoes, tool presentation, and SDK assembly paths much more important — relationship graphs scoped to a small bash/todo/subagent surface would have gone stale immediately.
## Decision
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ The hybrid pages must fail loud when their manifests are stale:
- The event producer/consumer matrix labels itself hybrid because subagent lifecycle events deliberately use `ctx.events.dispatch` for per-listener containment; those dynamic edges are explicit overrides rather than invisible omissions.
- `verify-mermaid` parses every repo-authored ` ```mermaid ` fence with Mermaid's own parser, so syntax errors fail `doc-sync` locally and in CI instead of showing up as broken GitHub-rendered diagrams.
## Format choices
## Alternatives considered
Use Mermaid for committed diagrams because GitHub renders it in Markdown and it adds no new docs build dependency. Use Markdown tables for dense many-to-many data such as event producer/consumer relationships. Do not adopt PlantUML, hosted diagram services, or generated SVGs until Mermaid becomes the limiting factor.
Committed diagrams use Mermaid because GitHub renders it in Markdown and it adds no new docs build dependency; dense many-to-many data such as event producer/consumer relationships uses Markdown tables instead. **PlantUML, hosted diagram services, and generated SVGs** were considered and deliberately not adopted until Mermaid becomes the limiting factor.
## Consequences
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# RFC: JSDoc completeness gate for the cordis surface
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-07-04)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
The [generated cordis catalog](2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md) already walks every harness `interface Events` member and every `ctx.<key>` service class with the TypeScript compiler API, and already hard-errors on a missing `@mode` tag — a forcing function that made dispatch modes impossible to leave undocumented. Nothing equivalent guarded the rest of the JSDoc: a service method could ship with no doc at all, and no event or method documented its parameters or return value individually. A survey at adoption found 5 public service methods with no JSDoc and roughly 139 missing `@param`/`@returns` entries across 15 files — on the product API spine (`ctx.bash`, `ctx.fs`, `ctx.sessions`, …) and the cross-plugin event payload contracts, exactly the surface where "what does this argument mean" is the question a plugin author asks the IDE.
@@ -20,10 +20,16 @@ The contract:
- **Explicitness the walk can check**: the gate is a pure-AST pass (no type checker), so a service method must annotate its return type (an inferred return cannot be classified) and surface parameters must be simple identifiers (a binding pattern has no name for `@param` to match).
- **Violations aggregate** into one error listing every offender — a remediation pass sees the whole list at once. The previously fail-fast `@mode` checks moved into the same aggregated report, with their message texts unchanged.
The tags are **enforcement-only**: `parseJsDoc` now ends description prose at the first block tag (standard JSDoc semantics, which also stops multi-line tag descriptions from leaking into the catalog as prose), so `@param`/`@returns` never change the rendered catalog. Rendering them — restructuring the services section into per-method entries — was considered and deliberately deferred: source JSDoc plus IDE hover is where method docs are consumed, and the catalog stays an index. No escape-hatch tag exists; the surface is small and curated (12 services, 57 methods, 27 events at adoption), and the point is that the check cannot be waved off.
The tags are **enforcement-only**: `parseJsDoc` now ends description prose at the first block tag (standard JSDoc semantics, which also stops multi-line tag descriptions from leaking into the catalog as prose), so `@param`/`@returns` never change the rendered catalog.
Negative-path tests in `packages/core/agent/tests/gen-cordis-catalog.spec.ts` drive `collectEvents`/`collectServices` against synthetic fixtures to prove each guard fires and that the exemptions hold. The authoring rule lives in the root [AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) conventions bullet alongside the `@mode` rule.
## Alternatives considered
- **An ESLint rule** — cannot see the scope's machine definition (which `interface Events` members and which `ctx.<key>` classes are the cordis surface); the catalog generator computes exactly that mapping on every run, so the gate lives there.
- **Rendering the tags into the catalog** — restructuring the services section into per-method entries was considered and deliberately deferred: source JSDoc plus IDE hover is where method docs are consumed, and the catalog stays an index.
- **An escape-hatch tag** — none exists; the surface is small and curated (12 services, 57 methods, 27 events at adoption), and the point is that the check cannot be waved off.
## Consequences
- A new event or service method cannot land with an undocumented parameter or result: the generator refuses to regenerate and `verify-cordis-catalog` fails pre-push and in CI. The ~139 gaps found at adoption were filled in the same change, so the gate landed green.
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
# Documentation tiers, budgets, and the ceiling gate
# RFC: Documentation tiers, budgets, and the ceiling gate
## Context
Status: implemented
## Problem
The repo's standing docs accrete. Root `AGENTS.md` reached 8,130 words through 50 commits in two and a half weeks — each PR appending its own lesson, none displacing anything — until the same rule was stated two or three times inside one file (the pushed-branch rewrite ban ~600 words across two sections; the with-key e2e policy ~400 words across two), an incident already recorded in [postmortem 0001](../../../postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md) was retold inline at ~750 words, and the per-package one-liner map existed in five places. [architecture.md](../../../architecture.md) grew the same way: paragraph walls re-narrating RFCs it already links, plus implementation-status annotations that were stale the week after they were written. The writing rules that forbid this (document current state, never history) predate the drift and sat in the very file violating them — prose rules alone do not hold against accretion pressure. The repo's standing answer to an invariant of this kind is a mechanical check ([quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md), [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)).
@@ -28,6 +30,5 @@ The repo's standing docs accrete. Root `AGENTS.md` reached 8,130 words through 5
The first audit cycle under the standard, in rough priority order (evidence gathered in the survey that motivated this RFC):
- Package README trims where generated catalogs or JSDoc are restated or history is narrated: `packages/ui/acp`, `packages/core/tools`, `packages/bash/tool-bash`, `packages/core/session`, `packages/compact/compact-basic`, `packages/session-persistence/session-persistence`.
- [The web capability seam RFC](../architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md) converted from spec-speak to shipped reality (drop the migration plan and test enumeration, "should" → "is").
- `docs/core-data-structures/core.md`: drop the JSDoc walls from the `Agent`/`GenerateOptions` type-equiv pastes per that page's own stated rule.
- [Postmortem 0001](../../../postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md): merge the overlapping Executive summary and Summary sections.
@@ -4,23 +4,29 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
`docs/rfc/README.md`'s per-lifecycle/per-class tables list facts that are fully derivable: an RFC's path encodes lifecycle and class, its filename encodes the first-proposed date, and its H1 carries the title. A hand-maintained copy of those facts is also the repo's highest-contention docs hotspot: every proposal wave appends rows to the same few lines, so concurrent RFC branches conflict precisely there while agreeing everywhere else, and each conflict is resolved by hand-merging rows whose content the filesystem already knows. [The classification RFC](2026-06-20-rfc-classification.md) originally kept the index hand-written for curation's sake — but the curated part of the README is the prose, and the prose never conflicts; only the mechanical tables do.
The RFC index's per-lifecycle/per-class tables list facts that are fully derivable: an RFC's path encodes lifecycle and class, its filename encodes the first-proposed date, and its H1 carries the title. A hand-maintained copy of those facts is also the repo's highest-contention docs hotspot: every proposal wave appends rows to the same few lines, so concurrent RFC branches conflict precisely there while agreeing everywhere else, and each conflict is resolved by hand-merging rows whose content the filesystem already knows. [The classification RFC](2026-06-20-rfc-classification.md) originally kept the index hand-written for curation's sake — but the curated part of the README is the prose, and the prose never conflicts; only the mechanical tables do.
## Decision
Keep the curated prose; generate the tables. [`scripts/rfc-index.ts`](../../../../scripts/rfc-index.ts) is the shared source of truth — the tree walker (owning the closed lifecycle/class sets and the structure rules, including a parseable-H1 requirement) and the renderer (rows from H1 title with any `RFC: ` prefix stripped, plus the filename date, sorted by date then filename, grouped as `### {Class}` sections in canonical class order). Two thin consumers share it:
Keep the curated prose; generate the list. The tables live in [`docs/rfc/INDEX.md`](../../INDEX.md), a **fully generated file** — the curated prose stays in README.md, which carries no index rows at all. [`scripts/rfc-index.ts`](../../../../scripts/rfc-index.ts) is the shared source of truth — the tree walker (owning the closed lifecycle/class sets and the structure rules, including a parseable-H1 requirement) and the renderer (rows from H1 title with any `RFC: ` prefix stripped, plus the filename date, sorted by date then filename, grouped as `### {Class}` sections in canonical class order). Two thin consumers share it:
- [`scripts/gen-rfc-index.ts`](../../../../scripts/gen-rfc-index.ts) (`pnpm run gen-rfc-index`) rewrites the three marker-delimited regions in the README (`<!-- gen-rfc-index:begin {lifecycle} -->` … `end`), one per `## {Lifecycle}` section, leaving everything outside the markers untouched.
- [`scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts`](../../../../scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts) (a `doc-sync` member) checks structure and asserts the committed regions byte-match a fresh render — the `gen-cordis-catalog`/`verify-cordis-catalog` pattern. Freshness subsumes the index-completeness check: a generated-from-disk table is definitionally complete and correctly headed.
- [`scripts/gen-rfc-index.ts`](../../../../scripts/gen-rfc-index.ts) (`pnpm run gen-rfc-index`) rewrites INDEX.md in full from the tree.
- [`scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts`](../../../../scripts/verify-rfc-classification.ts) (a `doc-sync` member) checks structure, asserts the committed INDEX.md byte-matches a fresh render — the `gen-cordis-catalog`/`verify-cordis-catalog` pattern — and rejects an index-shaped row in the curated README. Freshness subsumes the index-completeness check: a generated-from-disk table is definitionally complete and correctly headed.
Adding, moving, or deleting an RFC means editing only the RFC file and running the generator; the classification RFC's rejected-alternatives record carries the supersession cross-link.
## Why not the verifier-only model?
## Alternatives considered
It catches mistakes but still makes every proposal edit a shared hotspot, and a failed verifier is strictly more annoying than a generator for a purely mechanical row: the author has already named and placed the file; the index copy adds no information. This is the same hand-list-versus-derivation judgment the [package-inventory proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-06-20-discover-package-inventory.md) applies to tsconfig references and knip stanzas — applied to the one list that demonstrably conflicts.
### Why not marker-delimited regions inside README.md?
The first landed shape: the generator spliced the tables into README.md between `gen-rfc-index` marker comments, under each `## {Lifecycle}` heading. Superseded by the whole-file INDEX.md once the README also absorbed the in-file format contract ([the uniform-format RFC](2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md)): a front-door README hosting hundreds of generated rows dwarfed its curated prose, and splice mechanics (marker pairs, heading checks, outside-region row detection) exist only to protect curated text that a dedicated generated file simply doesn't contain.
### Why not the verifier-only model?
It catches mistakes but still makes every proposal edit a shared hotspot in a hand-maintained table, and a failed verifier is strictly more annoying than a generator for a purely mechanical row: the author has already named and placed the file; the index copy adds no information. This is the same hand-list-versus-derivation judgment the [package-inventory proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-06-20-discover-package-inventory.md) applies to tsconfig references and knip stanzas — applied to the one list that demonstrably conflicts.
## Consequences
- The generated regions are explicit: marker comments make script ownership obvious to reviewers, and the generator refuses to run on a structurally invalid tree.
- The generated file is explicit: its banner names the generator, there is no curated region to protect inside it, and the generator refuses to run on a structurally invalid tree.
- A malformed or missing H1 is a hard error in both the generator and the gate — the H1 is now load-bearing as the index title source.
- Concurrent RFC branches resolve index conflicts by rerunning the generator, never by hand-merging rows.
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# RFC: Generated persistence log event catalog
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-07-04)
Status: implemented
## Context
## Problem
The session event log is the harness's on-disk contract: every `SessionEventMap` member is a record a persistence backend writes verbatim and a replay reconstructs from, and adding one that breaks the durability rules is a breaking change to the on-disk format. Yet the vocabulary had no single reference. The declarations are split across three files — the owning interface in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-session` plus declaration merges in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-compact` and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-hook-protocol` — and the doc surfaces covered it with hand-copies: a `hook/*` payload table in [session.md](../../../core-data-structures/session.md), a `compact/*` payload table in the compact README, payload bullets in the hook-protocol README, and a name-list in the session README. The name-list's merge note had already drifted (it named the compaction merge and omitted the hook merge entirely), and nothing could catch the next merge going undocumented: a hand-copy only checks the names someone already wrote down. This is the same gap the [cordis catalog](2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md) closed for bus events and the [tool catalog](2026-07-02-tool-schema-catalog.md) closed for model-facing tools — and log events are covered by neither: a `SessionEventMap` member is not a cordis `Events` declaration (it reaches listeners via the single `session/event` emit), so it has no cordis-catalog row by design.
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The session event log is the harness's on-disk contract: every `SessionEventMap`
Generate `docs/persistence-catalog/log-events.md` from source, with a freshness gate, as the fourth reference surface: the *records* a persisted session log can contain, complementing the cordis catalog (wiring), core-data-structures (vocabulary), and the tool catalog (tools).
`scripts/gen-persistence-catalog.ts` is a pure TypeScript-AST pass, like `gen-cordis-catalog.ts` and unlike the boot-based tool catalog — the right technique because log events ARE statically knowable: every member is a string-literal-named property with a static type annotation, so the AST is the whole truth. The walk collects every `interface SessionEventMap` declaration under `packages/*/*/src` — the owning top-level interface and every `declare module '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'` merge — so a brand-new event, core or merged, appears in the next regenerate and an un-regenerated file fails `--check` (`verify-persistence-catalog`, a `doc-sync` member, so pre-push and CI both run it). Each entry renders the member's JSDoc prose, its payload (printed through the TypeScript printer, so a newline-separated multi-line type literal still yields a valid one-line fragment), a surface badge, cross-links into core-data-structures, and the declaration's source pointer, grouped by scope.
`scripts/gen-persistence-catalog.ts` is a pure TypeScript-AST pass, like `gen-cordis-catalog.ts` — log events ARE statically knowable: every member is a string-literal-named property with a static type annotation, so the AST is the whole truth. The walk collects every `interface SessionEventMap` declaration under `packages/*/*/src` — the owning top-level interface and every `declare module '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'` merge — so a brand-new event, core or merged, appears in the next regenerate and an un-regenerated file fails `--check` (`verify-persistence-catalog`, a `doc-sync` member, so pre-push and CI both run it). Each entry renders the member's JSDoc prose, its payload (printed through the TypeScript printer, so a newline-separated multi-line type literal still yields a valid one-line fragment), a surface badge, cross-links into core-data-structures, and the declaration's source pointer, grouped by scope.
Specific choices:
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ Specific choices:
This supersedes the hand-copies: the session.md `hook/*` table, the compact README's event table, the hook-protocol README's payload bullets, and the session README's name-list now link the catalog instead of restating payloads (the surrounding semantics prose stays where it was). The two stray `@mode emit` tags on the hook-protocol merge members are removed — the new gate rejects them as the category error they were.
## Alternatives considered
- **A boot-based generator, like the tool catalog's** — the log vocabulary is fully static, so the AST pass reads the whole truth without booting anything.
- **Keeping the hand-copies** — a hand-copy only checks the names someone already wrote down; the session README's merge note had already drifted when the catalog landed.
## Consequences
- The catalog cannot drift: a vocabulary change the committed file doesn't reflect fails `verify-persistence-catalog` in the pre-push hook and CI, and a new merged event with no JSDoc fails the generator outright — a plugin can no longer add an undocumented on-disk record type.
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# RFC: One gated in-file format for RFCs
Status: implemented
## Problem
The tree's layout is uniform — [the classification scheme](2026-06-20-rfc-classification.md) path-encodes lifecycle and class and gates both — but the file insides never were. The corpus the format decision faced had two H1 spellings; some fifteen `Status:` line spellings, from bare enums through dated parentheticals duplicating what the filename and git already carry, to four files with no status at all; two body genres side by side (ADR-style `Context`/`Decision`/`Consequences` beside proposal-style `Problem`/`Proposal`/`Risks`), so every new RFC guessed its shape from whichever neighbor its author opened; thirty-nine files carrying a debt comment that flagged them as "legacy ADR/RFC body format" awaiting a unified template that was never actually defined; and over twenty implemented RFCs still carrying the proposal-era headings (`Acceptance criteria`, `Plan`, `Migration plan`) that the [documentation standard's slop checklist](../../../AGENTS.md) outlaws for `implemented/` — outlawed, but enforced by nothing, so the `proposed/` → `implemented/` move could silently skip the rewrite [implemented/AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md) requires.
## Decision
[README.md § The file format](../../README.md#the-file-format) is the in-file contract — the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless, folder-agreeing `Status:` enum whose only content is the rejection reason), the per-lifecycle body skeleton (`Problem` opener everywhere; `Proposal`/`Acceptance criteria`/`Risks` in `proposed/`; present-tense `Decision`/`Consequences` with proposal-era headings banned in `implemented/`; frozen proposal shape in `rejected/`), a mandatory `Alternatives considered` section, and the canonical section vocabulary between which bespoke technical sections stay free-form. `pnpm run verify-rfc-format` ([scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts)) enforces every mechanical clause as part of `doc-sync`, so a lifecycle move that skips its rewrite now fails CI instead of review memory.
The whole corpus was normalized in the same change that defined the format — the pre-release stance: no transition period, no dual-format tolerance. The one grandfather is content, not format: alternatives are recorded, never invented, so a pre-format RFC whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record carries the exact `rfc-format: alternatives-not-recorded` comment, which the gate accepts only for files dated before this RFC.
## Alternatives considered
- **A full rigid template** (one fixed section sequence per lifecycle, every RFC restructured to fit) — rejected: the big design RFCs carry eight to fifteen bespoke technical sections (package topology, wire contracts, schemas) that are load-bearing content, not drift; a rigid sequence would force destructive rewrites now and template-fighting forever.
- **Header-only normalization** (H1 and Status, bodies untouched) — rejected: the debt markers flagged the *body* genre split, and leaving `Context`/`Decision` beside `Problem`/`Proposal` indefinitely resolves nothing.
- **No Status line** (the folder already is the status; the four newest pre-format RFCs omitted the line) — rejected in favor of keeping a self-describing file: the drift risk that motivated dropping it is neutralized by gating the line against the folder instead.
- **Dated status** (`Status: implemented (accepted YYYY-MM-DD)`) — rejected: the acceptance date is narrated history the writing rules keep out of docs; the filename carries first-proposed, git carries the rest, and the gate could check a date's format but never its truth.
- **A bare `# <title>` H1** — rejected: the `RFC: ` prefix is the corpus-majority form and self-describes the genre when a file is read outside its tree; the index generator strips it, so index rows are identical either way.
- **`## What we give up` as the implemented closer** (the README's own phrase for what an RFC records) — rejected: it names only costs, and an honest consequences section records what the trade-off bought as well.
- **Convention without a gate** (write the contract down, enforce by review) — rejected: the slop checklist already outlawed spec-speak in `implemented/` by convention, and over twenty files show what convention alone achieves here.
- **A standalone `FORMAT.md` contract file** — the first landed home; folded into README.md once the generated index moved out to [INDEX.md](../../INDEX.md): with the tables gone the README regained the room, and one front door carrying layout, classification, and format beats splitting the contract across two files.
## Consequences
Every RFC now costs slightly more structure, and the mandatory `Alternatives considered` section is deliberate friction: a decision recorded without what it beat invites the re-litigation RFCs exist to prevent. Pre-format RFCs whose alternatives were not reconstructible carry the grandfather comment permanently — an honest gap on the record rather than fabricated rationale. `doc-sync` gains one gate, and moving an RFC between lifecycle folders is now real work at move time (the body rewrite the move always owed) instead of deferred cleanup nothing tracked. The thirty-nine debt markers are gone, resolved by the template they were waiting for.