docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.

docs/rfc/implemented/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # RFC: Drop the `image` content block until a path can honor it
 
-Status: implemented (proposed and accepted 2026-07-04)
+Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
@@ -10,18 +10,18 @@ Status: implemented (proposed and accepted 2026-07-04)
 
 Remove `ImageBlock`, its `ContentBlockMap` entry (and its `cache?: CacheHint` field with it), the explicit `image` estimate/placeholder arms in compact-basic, and the image-naming comments in the deepseek serializer's, pi-ai converter's, and ACP codec's default arms — those default arms absorb the case the way they absorb any unknown block type. Updated in the same change: the vocabulary line in [architecture.md](../../../architecture.md), the block list in `packages/llm/llm/README.md`, the deepseek README's image-skip row, the pi-ai README's images-not-representable row, the compact-basic README's image-estimation and `[image]`-placeholder rows, the pastes in [core.md](../../../core-data-structures/core.md) and [llm-streaming.md](../../../core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md), and the [content-block vocabulary RFC](../architecture/2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md)'s block list and multimodal-home consequence per [implemented/AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md); the tests that constructed image blocks to exercise the removed branches were dropped (the estimate pin) or retargeted onto the merge-extensible default arms (plugin-added block types). The ACP codec's inbound rejection of image PROMPT content is unaffected — that guard is about protocol content a client can send regardless of our vocabulary, and it stays.
 
-## Why not keep it?
+## Alternatives considered
+
+### Why not keep it?
 
 This was the most contested cut in the batch. Multimodal input (screenshots) is a plausible near-term coding-agent feature, and the [content-block vocabulary RFC](../architecture/2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md) reserved the slot deliberately. Two responses. First, `ContentBlockMap` is merge-extensible by design: a real multimodal feature reintroduces `image` in core in the same coordinated change that maps it in the adapters, advertises and renders it in ACP, and prices it in compaction — the producer and its consumers arrive together, which is how the map is meant to grow. Second, the middle option — keep the type but make adapters throw UNSUPPORTED instead of silently dropping — converts this into exactly the shape the sibling request-knobs proposal (`2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs`) argues against: surface whose only implementation is rejection. Absence (a compile error at the would-be producer) is strictly clearer than either silent loss or universal throw.
 
 The recorded fallback, had review landed on keeping the slot: keep `ImageBlock` but replace every silent skip with a loud rejection, and document that policy in the vocabulary — the silent drop was the one state with no defender. Review landed on removal; the fallback stands as the documented alternative should the slot ever return ahead of a full feature.
 
-## Acceptance criteria
+## Verification
 
-- No `ImageBlock` / harness `type: 'image'` block construction outside this RFC; the codec's inbound ACP-image rejection still passes its tests.
-- Adapter/codec/compaction switches handle the case through their unknown-block default arms (pinned by the plugin-added-block tests).
-- Doc pastes, the manifest, and the architecture vocabulary list updated; `pnpm run doc-sync` green.
+No `ImageBlock` / harness `type: 'image'` block is constructed anywhere outside RFC records; the codec's inbound ACP-image rejection keeps its tests; and the adapter/codec/compaction switches handle the case through their unknown-block default arms, pinned by the plugin-added-block tests.
 
-## Risks
+## Consequences
 
 Re-adding a core vocabulary type later touches several packages at once — but that coordinated change is the shape a real multimodal feature needs anyway (adapter mapping, ACP advertisement, compaction pricing), and none of it existed to preserve.