Pine/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

docs(rfc): define and enforce a uniform RFC format; adopt it across the corpus

Browse Source 
Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.

Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.

Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.

The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-05 22:58:25 +08:00
parent d5cb3297ad
commit e6fad266a6
123 changed files with 1221 additions and 847 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/rfc/proposed/simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md
+3 -1
View File
@@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ Make an agent BE its session: one id. An agent's registry handle IS its `session
- The config path (`AgentLoop.create`) uses its configured `id` directly as the session id, applying whatever resume-or-create policy it adopts (today it appends a per-run uuid to avoid colliding with an on-disk log; that policy moves onto the single id, e.g. the config id IS the session and a durable backend resumes it — to be settled in the implementing PR).
- The registry's existing unique-`agentId` check becomes, by construction, a unique-session-id guarantee — the bash alias hole is closed with NO new defensive invariant: two agents cannot share a session id because the session id is the agent id.
## Why not just enforce session-id uniqueness in `AgentRegistry.register()`?
## Alternatives considered
### Why not just enforce session-id uniqueness in `AgentRegistry.register()`?
That was the review's first suggestion. It would couple the generic registry to a session-uniqueness assumption (the registry tracks *agents*, not sessions) and entrench the very separation this RFC removes. Unifying the ids closes the hole more cleanly — there is nothing left to enforce.