docs: equal-authority pairing with sidecar consistency records

Redesign per review: neither language is canonical. A pair is three
sibling files — foo.md, foo.zh.md, foo.i18n.yaml — and either language
may be authored first (a Chinese-first RFC is as legitimate as an
English-first one). The sidecar record holds the FULL git blob hash of
both sides as of the last confirmed-consistent state, replacing the
in-file one-directional fingerprint; editing either side without
re-confirming the pair goes red. New --write mode re-records a pair
after both sides are brought in line, making the confirmation a
reviewable yaml diff. Pairs merge whole (completeness enforced).

- gate rewritten around pair anchors (union of .zh.md and .i18n.yaml
  remnants) so half-deleted pairs are caught from either side; red/green
  proven for en-only edit, zh-only edit, missing record, and a record
  for an excluded file
- verify-rfc-classification now skips .zh.md counterparts (same RFC,
  indexed via its English filename; the pairing gate owns consistency)
- docs/i18n/README.md + translation-rules.md reframed bidirectionally
  (terminology table binds both directions; typography section governs
  the Chinese side); zh counterparts updated; skill workflow updated
- RFC amended to the shipped design, records the English-canonical
  in-file-fingerprint model as considered-and-revised; RFC translated
  (docs/rfc/.../2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md) and
  added to the required frontier
- generated docs stay excluded with the follow-up recorded: teach the
  generators to emit Chinese, then de-list

docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 517a6371eca5d747313c7efdb2756a50257701e4
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: f8f68bf5d4d7e6795318d9dd435a525f20a4f407

docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md

@@ -1,31 +1,36 @@
 # Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate
 
+English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)
+
 ## Context
 
-This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: the English file moves on, the Chinese file silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
+This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
 
 ## Decision
 
-- **Paired sibling files, English canonical.** The translation of `foo.md` is `foo.zh.md` in the same directory; English is the only authoring language and translation flows EN → ZH. Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md).
-- **A blob-hash fingerprint makes freshness checkable.** The first line of every `.zh.md` records the repo-relative path and the first 12 hex digits of the git blob hash of the English source it renders. Staleness is then a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hash is computable for a source edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash fingerprint (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model) is not.
-- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing translation is fresh/switched/structure-matched/non-orphaned, and excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
+- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md).
+- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), and excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
 - **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
+- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this RFC: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese RFC, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.
 - **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.
 - **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.
-- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial staleness invisible.
-- **Commit-hash fingerprints (MDN `l10n.sourceCommit`)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR source edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express "translated against the version this PR introduces", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.
-- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no fingerprint)** — rejected: formatting-only English edits would false-positive, and a translation committed after an unrelated English edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.
+- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.
+- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express "consistent as of the state this PR introduces", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.
+- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.
 
 ## Industry precedent
 
-Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or freshness in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Freshness automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a fingerprint gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.
+Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- Editing an English doc that has a `.zh.md` sibling obligates the same PR to update the translation — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.
-- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are never paired; their generators emit English only, and the gate rejects a stray translation of them.
-- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so translation lands in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR.
-- The fingerprint doubles as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers the exact translated-from text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.
+- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.
+- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
+- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
+- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
+- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR.
+- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.

docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# 通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档
+
+[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文
+
+## 背景
+
+本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。没有机制、纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的方式：一侧继续演进，另一侧默默地说谎，而没有门禁会注意到。对这类不变式，本仓库一贯的答案是把它编码成机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
+
+## 决策
+
+- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。**一对文档是三个兄弟文件：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，加一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典——一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束这对文件的是两侧必须说同样的话，且配对整体合入（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md)。
+- **旁挂记录两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。**`foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致状态下各自的完整 git blob hash。此后改了任一侧而没重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来——纯内容比较、无需查询历史——而且同一个 PR 里改动的文件也能算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 里是一个显式、可见的动作。
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。**门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行：required 的配对存在；任何已存在的配对完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 都匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）保持不配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单是一个棘轮：每个合入的翻译批次把自己的文件加进去，覆盖面只增不减。
+- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。**进仓的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 同一模式：skill 承载工作流，并把真源让给文档。
+
+## 曾考虑的替代方案
+
+- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**——本 RFC 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 RFC，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的旁挂记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制原样保留。
+- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**——否决：本仓库没有把 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架，挪动每个英文文件会搅动所有既有交叉引用，且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑而不是原样工作。
+- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**——否决：适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自己的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁够不到的地方。
+- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**——否决：每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 工效，且局部不一致不可见。
+- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**——否决，改用 blob hash：同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。
+- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**——否决：纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的另一侧会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号与门禁的承诺名实相符。
+
+## 业界先例
+
+带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`）——但这些仓库都没有在 CI 里**强制**配对或一致性；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国之外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit、为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计把两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加 hash 对门禁，再加一个进仓 agent skill（技能）替代 bot 服务。
+
+## 后果
+
+- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新另一侧并重新记录配对——门禁把 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。
+- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
+- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢——由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）禁止中文先行撰写。
+- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让它们的生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时移出排除清单。
+- 推进天然是渐进的：`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog（`--list`），不是红的 CI，因此配对按可评审的批次落地，无需一个巨型 PR。
+- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），所以这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。