docs: fix review findings — residual ordinals, hypothetical IPC row, citation-rule amendments
Purge the residual task/phase ordinals review caught ((T2), (queue cut 1) ×3, T6, P-I, 'this cut' ×6 including battery-expansion finds in two untouched notes and a workflow JSDoc); drop the 'externally logged as Decision 21' parenthetical and rename the remaining bare decision-21 mentions; mark the gui-layering IPC bridge row as a hypothetical example; restore the GATE_NOTICE doc-typecheck clause and the py-types 'measured' provenance; say subprocess-backed in filesystem.md; add the picker note path. Amend the citations note: merged-PR evidence anchors in Agent Notes are sanctioned, and the candidate gate patterns gain the four shapes the sweep missed. All nine touched pairs re-recorded.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Each `start` spawns a new child, runs exactly one ACP session (`initialize` →
|
||||
|
||||
### Minimal client stub
|
||||
|
||||
The client advertises NO optional capabilities (no `fs`, no `terminal`): the child self-serves file/terminal access in its own process. `session/update` notifications are consumed — the backend accumulates `agent_message_chunk` text as the result output and ignores the rest (thoughts, tool-call cards) in this cut, which surfaces only the child's final answer. `session/request_permission` is auto-answered by a configured policy (`reject` declines every prompt, `allow` approves via the first allow-shaped option) — the first cut surfaces no prompt to a human. Proxying `fs`/`terminal` back to the parent (a shared-workspace mode) remains future work, as the seam Agent Note noted.
|
||||
The client advertises NO optional capabilities (no `fs`, no `terminal`): the child self-serves file/terminal access in its own process. `session/update` notifications are consumed — the backend accumulates `agent_message_chunk` text as the result output and ignores the rest (thoughts, tool-call cards), so only the child's final answer surfaces. `session/request_permission` is auto-answered by a configured policy (`reject` declines every prompt, `allow` approves via the first allow-shaped option) — no prompt is surfaced to a human. Proxying `fs`/`terminal` back to the parent (a shared-workspace mode) remains future work, as the seam Agent Note noted.
|
||||
|
||||
### No start-time capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user