Comparing a feedback-time PR commit directly with the landing merge lets unrelated target-branch changes satisfy a review comment and creates false adoption evidence.
Define feedback-time and final PR-specific patch snapshots, fail closed when the landing shape cannot be reconstructed, and require a target-only negative control before implementation.
A saved complete-file candidate could overwrite newer skill guidance, while a provider-wide outage was indistinguishable from a healthy no-op run. Record the source blob and provenance, reject drift during promotion, and make total adapter failure visible.
Align cadence and feedback acquisition with the evidence contract, and narrow the borrowed-state and negative-control checks so they do not contradict the package and testing standards.
Refresh the background-task branch onto the latest repository baseline before applying review feedback. This preserves merge ancestry, incorporates the current CI and package-structure changes, and ensures the review fixes are validated against the code that will actually receive the PR.
The background-task change repeated its lifecycle design across implemented RFCs, package READMEs, JSDoc, test commentary, and model-visible schemas. That repetition obscured the contracts that maintainers must preserve and added avoidable prompt tokens.
Rewrite the implemented RFCs around the current design, keep authorization, exact-owner cleanup, wait/abort ordering, producer quiescence, and teardown-failure guarantees at their owning surfaces, and remove peer surveys, review history, control-flow narration, and emphatic restatement.
Shorten the task and subagent schema wording, synchronize the bilingual tool cookbook, and regenerate the config, service, RFC, tool, and replay snapshot derivatives. Runtime behavior is unchanged; test edits update prose-only assertions and descriptions.
A private out-of-repo maintainer tool turns adopted human review feedback
into candidate skill updates. Only the resulting SKILL.md diff enters this
repository through normal PR review; the tool source, adapter binaries,
provider credentials, and scheduler stay on the maintainer's machine to
keep this repository focused on shipped product code. Kept in proposed/
until end-to-end verification against master lands a candidate PR; the
acceptance criteria list the exact observations that unlock promotion.
Repair cross-group README links whose targets changed groups
(ui/jsonrpc, ui/app-boot -> examples; examples/* -> ui seams),
re-record the bilingual-pair consistency hashes for the docs the
rename touched on both language sides, and condense the AGENTS.md and
packages/README.md group entries. The packages/README ceiling rises
710 -> 760 for the mandated new examples/ hierarchy row (5% headroom).
Move the agent-spine bundle and the stdio/ACP/JSON-RPC app packages out of
core/ and ui/ into a new packages/examples/ group, renamed with a -demo
suffix so the npm name marks them as non-product surface:
core/agent-core -> examples/agent-spine-demo (dsh-agent-spine-demo)
ui/stdio-agent -> examples/stdio-demo (dsh-stdio-demo)
ui/acp-agent -> examples/acp-demo (dsh-acp-demo)
ui/jsonrpc-agent -> examples/jsonrpc-demo (dsh-jsonrpc-demo)
Update every code/config/test reference and reference-only doc mentions, and
regenerate module-graph, config-catalog, and doc-graphs. The jsonrpc bin
(dsh-jsonrpc-agent) and single-file exe (dsh-jsonrpc-agent-pkg) keep their
names; the SDK runtime-startup surface is reconciled separately.
Tianyi Cui