Rebuild the todo row's parallel summary on the shared ToolRow that master
introduced: planSummary still returns the active name and the remaining
count separately, and the row hands the count to a new non-shrinking
summarySuffix slot so a narrow row clips the summary text before the count.
An error row drops the suffix, whose collapsed summary is the failure line.
Re-record the ACP todo-write transcript for the parallel prompt, regenerate
the config catalog for the required allowParallelInProgress field, and
re-record the bilingual pairing hashes.
Update every doc referencing base.cordis.yml/web.cordis.yml, --config, -p, or
$DSH_HOME/config.yaml to the profile vocabulary with bilingual counterparts
re-recorded; regenerate the catalogs and graphs; add the
profile-plugin-bundles Agent Note recording the design and its rejected
alternatives.
The 'adding a language is two table entries plus its renderer' checklist
predates the `CodeSdkLanguage` union and now contradicts the mechanism
sentence beside it: following it literally leaves the union untouched, which
is exactly the excess-property error that sentence promises. It is three
parallel edits, in the note's Decision and Consequences and in the
`SDK_RENDERERS` JSDoc.
Two guard descriptions still claimed work the compiler took over. The
Decision's 'the drift this guards against' now names the `satisfies` pins and
leaves the guards their reachable case, a mounted runtime reporting a language
neither table knows; `resolveFlavor`'s JSDoc drops 'keeps the table coupled to
SDK_RENDERERS' for the same reason. The Consequences said a half-added
language 'cannot arise' for the runtime guards — it can, one PR later at the
consumer's integration point, and never on this base; the claim is now about
timing rather than impossibility.
`SDK_RENDERERS` and `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` had to stay in step by review alone:
the `Object.hasOwn` guards catch drift only once a runtime reporting the
half-added language exists, which is the one case that cannot arise. Both
tables are now `satisfies`-checked against a shared `CodeSdkLanguage` union,
so a missing or extra entry fails `typecheck`. The declared `Record<string, …>`
type stays, since `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`.
The code-runtime seam's own README row and `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc still
named `'typescript'` as the sole well-known value; both now name `'python'`
too and say only `'typescript'` has a published backend.
The previous commit's `UNPRINTABLE` sentence said the raw-reach point for all
three characters is `pyScalar`'s `JSON.stringify`, and the test comment said
that route is the only one. Both are exclusive claims and both are false: the
subscript tool-name comment calls `JSON.stringify` itself, and a tool name
carrying NEL, LS, or PS always lands there, none of the three being
`XID_Continue`. `pyScalar`'s own docstring already recorded that inheritance,
so the file contradicted itself. Both sentences now name the two call sites.
The note's evaluation axis was introduced as "the `typing` names the block
spells", which excludes one of its own members (`A | B` is operator syntax)
and omitted PEP 585 builtin generics — `dict[str, Any]` and `list[…]` appear
in nearly every render and need 3.9. The axis is now "the names and syntax the
block would evaluate at definition time", enumerated 3.8 through 3.11.
The test title covered two of the three characters it asserts; NEL is NEXT
LINE, neither a line nor a paragraph separator.
Four non-blocking review suggestions, all prose plus one assertion.
`UNPRINTABLE`'s new sentence named three characters but only two raw-reach
points, leaving "and NEL?" open; it now says all three reach text through
`pyScalar`, and how the description path handles each. `pyScalar`'s
raw-pass-through list already covered NEL under "the C1 controls", and the
test now pins it alongside LS and PS, so the docstring's claim has a
mechanical check for every character it names.
The test title said "paragraph separators" for a pair whose first member is
LINE SEPARATOR. Two docstring paragraphs are reflowed to the file's ~80
columns after the earlier inserts left short lines.
The note's CPython-floor obligation gains a second axis: the `typing` names
the block spells (`TypedDict` 3.8, `NotRequired` 3.11, `A | B` annotations
3.10) are definition-time evaluation floors, not parse floors, so the floor PR
does not read "parseable on the supported range" as "executable on it".
The `mode: 'code'` qualification landed on the module header and
`isBareIdentifier` but not on the other three sites the same reviews
enumerated. `UNPRINTABLE`'s "only declaration of the tools", the open-object
comment's "only signal that extra keys are accepted", and the docstring
comment's "only description of what a tool does" are each false under
`mode: 'both'`, where the native schemas ship alongside the SDK.
Widen the note's predicate-path sentence past head and last position: a
character added to `XID_Continue` passes `IDENTIFIER`'s trailing quantifier
anywhere after the head, the middle of a name included.
Record the ƛ test's table provenance. U+A7DC and the U+019B mapping to it
both arrive in Unicode 16.0, and the engines floor sits exactly there:
Node 22.19.0 reports Unicode 16.0 (ICU 77.1) and produces the mapping.
`camelCase`'s `toUpperCase()` is a fourth reader of the engine's Unicode
tables, on a table distinct from XID membership and with a wider window: a
tool named U+019B passes `isBareIdentifier` and compiles as `async def` on
CPython 3.9.6, but Node maps the head to U+A7DC and the declared
`class Args` fails there with `invalid non-printable character`. Record it
alongside the three XID read points in the renderer docs and in the note's
CPython-floor obligation, and pin the derivation with a test.
Correct three over-quantified sentences: a `camelCase`-derived class name is
evaluated for every tool but only reaches emitted text when some object shape
in the schema declares a `TypedDict`. Attribute the `str.isidentifier()`
equivalence to `IDENTIFIER` rather than to the predicate, which is
deliberately stricter, and restore the antecedent the mode qualification
dropped.
The predicate is not the only reader of the engine's XID tables. camelCase
reads them through its split set and its head test, and the class name it
derives is emitted for EVERY tool -- including one the predicate rejected,
whose TypedDict is still declared and named. A tool named `zz-` + U+1E4D0
never reaches the skew in the predicate, since the `-` rejects it outright,
yet still emits `class Zz<U+1E4D0>xArgs`, which CPython 3.9.6 refuses the
same way. A backend PR executing "pin the predicate against tables for the
floor" literally would leave that path open, so the note and the docstring
now name all three read points.
Two corrections in the same paragraph. The failing direction is a character
added to XID_Start OR XID_Continue -- one added only to the latter passes
the trailing `\p{XID_Continue}*` in a tail position and fails identically.
And the safe direction routes a name to the subscript/`dict[str, Any]`
path: a rejected FIELD name degrades its whole enclosing object rather than
just itself, which the predicate's opening paragraph already said.
Also qualify the module header's "ONLY source" claim, which holds under
`mode: 'code'` but not `both`, where wireSchemas ships every native schema
alongside the SDK section; record the measured str.isidentifier()
equivalence (21 samples, zero divergence, Node 22.23.1 vs CPython 3.9.6)
where the versions it is relative to already live; and attribute the
`FInd` spelling in the ligature test to full case mapping rather than to
the NFKC step, which is the identity there.
Two tests. The fold-collision half of the childClassName fix: sibling joins
that are byte-distinct before NFKC and equal after, so `usedClassNames`
dedupes by raw bytes and the counter only sees the collision because the
join is normalized. And the argument-side oneOf-of-objects branch naming,
which reaches the same childClassName path the output side already pins.
A configuration surface never holds a stored secret — it edits a redacted
descriptor — so once a key is saved, the draft it sends carries the route and
the endpoint and no credential at all. The interrogation went out
unauthenticated and the endpoint's 401 came back as "check the API key",
pointing at the one thing that was fine.
A named route now supplies its own credential, resolved exactly as a request
to it would be. A key typed into the form still wins: it is the one under
test, and may be the replacement for the stored one that is failing.
Resolution is a callback the probe invokes past the catalog short-circuit and
the protocol check, so a route answered from the installed registry costs no
credential lookup — and cannot fail over a credential the question never
needed.
creatixchu