The linked implemented note is the current-state authority for both one-line
todo surfaces and still specified a single in-progress item: "the in-progress
item as the collapsed one-line hint" and "N/M done · active item". Since the
cap on parallel in_progress items was lifted, both surfaces name the first
active item and count the rest in a separate non-shrinking span.
Bilingual pair updated together and re-recorded.
Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.
planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.
The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.
Lifting the single-in_progress cap makes a list shape reachable that the
web surfaces never received. Two sites derived their one-line summary with
todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress') — the collapsed TodoPanel header
and the todo_write row — which was total under the old cap and silently
dropped every active item but the first once several could match: a plan
with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one. The expanded list
was always correct, so neither PR's tests covered it.
Both sites now take planSummary in contract/todo-plan-model.ts, the
domain-shared face both the skeleton and toolviews domains may import; the
duplicated derivation was why one find could be fixed while the other
stayed wrong. The hint names the first active item and suffixes +<n> for
the rest, so the collapsed line reports how many tasks are running.
The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items in_progress, so the
assembled web transcript replays a parallel plan: the row reads
'1/4 已完成 · 实现 fixture 样本 +1' over the built bundles.
Stack the parallel-in_progress change on the web todo display (#497): the
GUI is now the surface where several active items are visible, so the two
land as a chain rather than colliding on tool-todo at merge time.
Conflicts combined rather than resolved to one side: tool-todo keeps this
branch's parallel-allowing validation AND web2-todo's additionalProperties
unknown-key rejection, in src/index.ts and both README sides; the spec
drops web2-todo's 'two in_progress' rejection case and keeps its unknown-key
case; the two headless advanced-toolchain session fixtures keep this
branch's parallel transcripts.
Three ds-review-bot round-8 findings on the todo display surfaces.
TodoPanel took the whole `useSession` hook and cast the snapshot to reach
`todos`, which put slot plumbing and an unchecked cast inside the presentation
component. The panel now takes `todos: readonly TodoItem[]`; TodoDock does the
selecting, matching the QueueDock posture the dock slot already establishes.
The todo row carried `onClick` with no keyboard route, so its details panel was
mouse-only. It now takes ToolRow's route verbatim: `role="button"`,
`tabIndex={0}`, and an Enter/Space handler that claims the event. The row stays
a `<div>` because a `<button>` flattens its inline spans.
`session.history`'s tail-only `todos` field was documented at the TS signature
but not in the apiproxy README pair, and the Agent Note claimed the feature
added no new wire vocabulary. Both README sides now state the tail/omission
semantics (an omitted field on a tail response is the empty plan, not unchanged
state), and the note records the one added field instead of denying it.
Tests: TodoPanel specs render the plain list; new TodoDock specs cover selection,
live follow, rollback-to-empty, and the registration shape; a new row spec pins
Enter/Space activation and non-activating keys.
An omitted `todos` on a tail request was treated as "no projection carried"
and preserved the prior value. Every installWindow caller is a tail request
(doOpen, its gap re-pull, repairGap; loadOlder prepends without it), which the
host answers with the full-log projection or omits only when the log holds no
todo/write — so the field's absence is the authoritative empty list. A live
write whose host crashed before persisting therefore left the rolled-back plan
on screen indefinitely; the assignment now clears it on the next open or
resync. Widened the parameter to an explicit `| undefined` so the two meanings
cannot be conflated again, and updated the JSDoc at both declaring seams plus
the bilingual README/note pair.
The automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation (its
edge test asserts plan updates are omitted; the todo-write tool note records
the mapping's retirement). Chinese counterpart updated, pair re-recorded;
the TodoPanel header comment drops the same claim.
- TodoPanel mounts through a 'conversation.input.dock' list entry
(todoDockEntry, QueueDock posture, order -1 above the queue rows) instead
of a ConversationRoot hardcode; the inner component is unchanged and takes
useSession from the dock entry's standard kit.
- The verify-todo-display.mjs chromium probe is replaced by an assembled
keyless snapshot (apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts, the
code-mode-fixture idiom) pinning the TodoRow summary/state, the dock
panel content, and the collapse round-trip over built bundles.
- Fake snapshots across specs gain the todos field; bilingual note/READMEs
updated for the dock mount and the snapshot.
The origin/master merge's directory-rename detection relocated the
trio to implemented/feature/ (master's note-archiving sweep renamed
many implemented/ files, and the rejection move predated the merge);
move it back to rejected/feature/ where the rejection commit put it.
User verdict: landstrip is not battle-tested — a days-old,
single-maintainer project (~48 GitHub stars at rejection), which a
security-invariant dependency cannot be. The note moves
proposed/feature -> rejected/feature with the verdict on the Status
line; the sandbox note's deferred-phases cross-link now records the
rejection instead of instructing an evaluation, and the NIH roll-up's
pointer follows. Supersedes this branch's earlier cross-link commit.
Conflict resolution: scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json takes master's new
paired-derivative format (one primary entry per pair) and re-adds this
stack's CodeDispatchLog entry in that format. zh README pairs brought
along for the dispatch-log arm (spill-policy behavior/limitations bullets,
tools limitation bullet now pointing at the shipped bounding).
The sandbox note's deferred-phases plan for the Windows chain now points
at the proposed landstrip evaluation gate, so whoever picks up that rung
finds the pending evaluation. The landstrip note itself stays proposed;
this only tracks where the pending decision lives (a permitted
keep-implemented-notes-current edit). Mirrored in the .zh.md and the
pair re-recorded.
Responding to ds-review-bot round 2 on #661:
- logWork is bounded: past maxParallelSubCalls pending shaped-append tasks
the ordered commit lane holds (Promise.race drains one), so a slow spill
backend backpressures the run instead of accumulating unbounded pending
I/O and retained results. Tasks self-remove on settlement; run
settlement still drains every task inside the open turn. New spill test
drives three oversized reads against a hung backend at cap 1 and proves
the third dispatch cannot start until a save drains.
- shapeDispatchLog's catch uses errorMessage() (total), so a thrown value
with a throwing toString cannot escape the containment and lose the
settle event.
- CodeDispatchLog.content documented as the RENDERED result projection
(native tool/result vocabulary), not what the program received — the
program gets the structured value; doc pair + type-equiv re-synced.
- New RECORDED tui-agent snapshot scenario code-mode-dispatch-spill: the
real Loader-visible composition (worker runtime + spill-local + policy)
drives an oversized bash sub-call end-to-end; replay proves the durable
dispatch copy is bounded to preview + locator while the program value
stays whole (the outer result carries just the line count).
Agent Note updated (both languages).
Chinesezjc