4dafad4db6
Eight proposals grouped by category, each with problem statement, concrete plan, and risks: property-based testing over the protocol-shaped core (chunk streams, event logs, schema DSL); mutation testing as the counterweight to the 100%-coverage gate; deterministic tests + a universal replay-invariant fixture + nightly race stress; architectural conformance (dependency-cruiser rules and the LlmAdapter conformance kit); runtime arg validation at the model boundary with a structured error taxonomy and dev-mode invariants; doc-sync enforcement (typechecked doc snippets, API reports); supply-chain checks and nightly vendor-drift verification against the manifest; and deep-readonly public surfaces (logged-vs-in-flight mutability boundary). AGENTS.md points at docs/adr and docs/rfc.
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
RFC 007: Supply chain checks and vendor drift verification
Status: proposed
Problem
The vendor manifest (ADR 0001) is enforced at commit time in the forward direction (vendored change ⇒ manifest update) but nothing verifies the manifest's claims: that vendor/ actually equals upstream-at-SHA plus exactly the logged modifications. And the handful of true npm dependencies have no advisory monitoring or update cadence.
Proposal
- Vendor drift check (nightly CI): clone the upstream repos at the
manifest SHAs (shallow), copy the corresponding package sources, and diff
against
vendor/*/src. The job fails unless the diff matches the logged local modifications (kept as a checked-in patch file per modification — the log entries become verifiable artifacts rather than prose). - Dependency advisories: osv-scanner (or
yarn npm audit) job on the lockfile, scheduled + on lockfile-touching PRs. - License inventory: a script asserting every vendored package carries
its LICENSE and that package.json
licensefields match the inventory in vendor/README.md (we mix vendored MIT with our BSD-3) — CI step. - Renovate (or a scheduled agent task) proposing npm dependency updates in small PRs that ride the full gate suite; vendored packages are excluded (their updates follow the manifest sync procedure, ideally as a semi-automated agent workflow: fetch upstream, re-apply patches, run gates, open PR with the manifest table updated).
Plan
3 is trivial — do first. 1 requires network access from CI to the upstream repos (private — needs a token) and converting the two existing logged modifications into patch files. 2 and 4 are config.
Risks
Upstream repos are private mirrors; CI credentials and availability are the main friction for the drift check. If blocked, run it as a local scheduled agent task instead of CI.