Tianyi Cui
605587e79c
Add a second axis to every RFC — its class (feature, bug-fix,
simplification, architecture, process, testing) — encoded in the path
as docs/rfc/{lifecycle}/{class}/file.md. The folder is the label, so
the closed set is enforced by structure rather than a parsed field.
Two new doc-sync gates back it:
- verify-rfc-classification: every RFC sits in a valid class folder and
the README index lists it under the matching lifecycle→class heading.
- verify-doc-refs: every docs/*.md path cited in a packages|examples TS
comment resolves — closes a drift class verify-md-links can't see, and
catches the four comment refs this reorg moved.
The README gains a Classification section explaining the taxonomy and
per-class index sub-sections. A self-referential process RFC records why
the scheme is path-encoded and gated.
20 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
20 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# RFC: Tool schemas are part of the system-prompt assembly
|
|
|
|
Status: implemented (accepted 2026-06-11)
|
|
|
|
<!-- XXX: legacy ADR/RFC body format, not yet normalized to a unified RFC template. -->
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
On the wire, tool schemas travel in a dedicated `tools` field of the model request, not in prompt text. Architecturally, though, "what the model is told it can do" is one coherent concern: prompt sections and the tool list are assembled from the same plugin contributions and consumed at the same moment. The alternative — the loop querying the tool registry separately from the prompt service — splits one concern across two seams.
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
`PromptAssembly { sections, tools }`: the system-prompt service collects ordered text sections AND tool schemas (the tool registry auto-contributes a provider). The loop consumes one assembly per step; adapters map `sections` to the provider's system slot and `tools` to the wire `tools` field. The `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall is therefore a single interception point for everything the model is told up front — tool filtering (ToolSearch / progressive disclosure) is an assembly rewrite, same as prompt edits.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
- One waterfall governs the model's standing context; plugins like plan mode can swap prompt text and visible tools in one listener.
|
|
- The assembly interface is merge-extensible for future slots (no untyped `extras` bag — extension is declaration merging).
|
|
- Slight conceptual surprise (schemas in a "prompt" service) is documented here and in the package README.
|